Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):215-25.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.215.

Distributing $800 billion: an early assessment of Medicare Part D risk adjustment

Affiliations

Distributing $800 billion: an early assessment of Medicare Part D risk adjustment

John Hsu et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

The viability and stability of the Medicare Part D prescription drug program depend on accurate risk-adjusted payments. The current approach, prescription drug hierarchical condition categories (RxHCCs), uses diagnosis and demographic information to predict future drug costs. We evaluated the performance of multiple approaches for predicting 2006 Part D drug costs and plan liability. RxHCCs explain 12 percent of the variation in actual drug costs, overpredict costs for beneficiaries with low actual costs, and underpredict costs for beneficiaries with high actual costs. Combining RxHCCs with individual-level information on prior-year drug use greatly improves performance and decreases incentives for plans to select against bad risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Exhibit 4
Exhibit 4. Comparison of Predicted Versus Observed Part D Drug Expenditures, by 5% Groups Based on Observed Expenditures
Source: Authors' analysis Exhibit 4 displays the predicted versus observed expenditures using three risk adjustment approaches, by the level of actual 2006 Part D drug expenditures (20 levels with each representing 5% of the total population). The three approaches are 1) RxHCC alone; 2) RxHCC combined with prior year drug category data; and 3) RxHCC combined with prior year drug expenditure data. The third approach uses 2005 drug expenditures and includes a term for costs2. Data points above the diagonal line indicate that predicted expenditures were higher than actual expenditures for the group (over-payment); points below the diagonal indicate that predicted expenditures were lower than the actual expenditures (under-payment).
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 5. Comparison of Predicted Versus Observed Plan Liability, by 5% Groups Based on Observed Plan Liability
Source: Authors' analysis Exhibit 5 displays the predicted versus observed plan liability using three risk adjustment approaches, by the level of actual 2006 Plan liability (20 levels with each representing 5% of the total population). The three approaches are 1) RxHCC alone; 2) RxHCC combined with prior year drug category data; and 3) RxHCC combined with prior year drug expenditure data. The third approach uses 2005 drug expenditures and includes a term for costs2. Data points above the diagonal line indicate that predicted expenditures were higher than actual expenditures for the group (over-payment); points below the diagonal indicate that predicted expenditures were lower than the actual expenditures (under-payment).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cutler DM, Reber S. Paying for Health Insurance: the Tradeoff Between Competition and Adverse Selection. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1998 May;:433–466.
    2. Huskamp HA, et al. The Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit: How Will the Game Be Played? Health Affairs. 2000 March;:8–23. - PubMed
    3. Newhouse JP, et al. Risk Adjustment and Medicare: Taking a Closer Look. Health Affairs. 1997 September;:26–43. - PubMed
    4. Newhouse JP. Risk Adjustment: Where Are We Now? Inquiry. 1998:122–131. - PubMed
    5. Pauly MV, Zeng Y. Adverse Selection and the Challenges to Stand-Alone Prescription Drug Insurance. Front Health Policy Research. 2004:55–74. - PubMed
    1. Iezzoni LI, et al. Paying More Fairly for Medicare Capitated Care. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998 December 24;:1933–1938. - PubMed
    2. Pope GC, et al. Risk Adjustment of Medicare Capitation Payments Using the CMS-HCC Model. Health Care Financing Review. 2004:119–141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robst J, et al. Diagnosis-Based Risk Adjustment for Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Payments. Health Care Financing Review. 2007:15–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission Report to the Congress: Increasing the Value of Medicare. 2006
    1. Robst J, et al. Diagnosis-Based Risk Adjustment

Publication types