Divergent effects of PERK and IRE1 signaling on cell viability

PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004170. Epub 2009 Jan 12.

Abstract

Protein misfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) activates a set of intracellular signaling pathways, collectively termed the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). UPR signaling promotes cell survival by reducing misfolded protein levels. If homeostasis cannot be restored, UPR signaling promotes cell death. The molecular basis for the switch between prosurvival and proapoptotic UPR function is poorly understood. The ER-resident proteins, PERK and IRE1, control two key UPR signaling pathways. Protein misfolding concomitantly activates PERK and IRE1 and has clouded insight into their contributions toward life or death cell fates. Here, we employed chemical-genetic strategies to activate individually PERK or IRE1 uncoupled from protein misfolding. We found that sustained PERK signaling impaired cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis. By contrast, equivalent durations of IRE1 signaling enhanced cell proliferation without promoting cell death. These results demonstrate that extended PERK and IRE1 signaling have opposite effects on cell viability. Differential activation of PERK and IRE1 may determine life or death decisions after ER protein misfolding.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Apoptosis / physiology*
  • Cell Line
  • Cell Survival / physiology*
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum / enzymology*
  • Endoribonucleases / metabolism*
  • Humans
  • Membrane Proteins / metabolism*
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases / metabolism
  • Protein Folding
  • Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases / metabolism*
  • Signal Transduction
  • eIF-2 Kinase / metabolism*

Substances

  • Membrane Proteins
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases
  • ERN2 protein, human
  • PERK kinase
  • Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases
  • eIF-2 Kinase
  • Endoribonucleases