Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening
- PMID: 19139323
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.519
Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer screening is underused. Our objective was to evaluate methods for promoting colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice.
Methods: A 2 x 2 factorial randomized clinical trial measured the effects of a tailored vs nontailored physician recommendation letter and an enhanced vs nonenhanced physician office and patient management intervention on colorectal cancer screening adherence. The enhanced and nonenhanced physician office and patient management interventions varied the amount of external support to help physician offices develop and implement colorectal cancer screening programs. The study included 10 primary care physician office practices and 599 screen-eligible patients aged 50 to 79 years. The primary end point was medical-record-verified flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Statistical end-point analysis (according to randomization intent) used generalized estimating equations to account for correlated outcomes according to physician group.
Results: During a 1-year period, endoscopy in the lower gastrointestinal tract (lower endoscopy) occurred in 289 of 599 patients (48.2%). This finding included the following rates of lower endoscopy: 81 of 152 patients (53.3%) in the group that received the tailored letter and enhanced management; 103 of 190 (54.2%) in the group that received the nontailored letter and enhanced management; 58 of 133 (43.6%) in the group that received the tailored letter and nonenhanced management; and 47 of 124 (37.9%) in the group that received the nontailored letter and nonenhanced management. Enhanced office and patient management increased the odds of completing a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy by 1.63-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.41; P = .01). However, the tailored letter increased the odds of completion by only 1.08-fold (95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.62; P = .71).
Conclusions: Approximately one-half of the screen-eligible primary medical care patients aged 50 to 79 years obtained lower endoscopic colorectal cancer screening within 1 year of recommendation. An enhanced office and patient management system significantly improved colorectal cancer screening adherence.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00327457.
Similar articles
-
Interventions fail to increase cancer screening rates in community-based primary care practices.Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.055. Prev Med. 2004. PMID: 15313081 Clinical Trial.
-
Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.Prev Med. 2001 Oct;33(4):249-60. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0878. Prev Med. 2001. PMID: 11570828 Clinical Trial.
-
Colorectal cancer screening: physician attitudes and practices.WMJ. 2002;101(5):39-43. WMJ. 2002. PMID: 12239980
-
Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review.Prev Med. 2004 May;38(5):536-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.011. Prev Med. 2004. PMID: 15066356 Review.
-
Considerations regarding the present and future roles of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer prevention.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 May;6(5):506-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.02.025. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008. PMID: 18455696 Review.
Cited by
-
Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk (CHURCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2024 Apr 26;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08110-z. Trials. 2024. PMID: 38671470 Free PMC article.
-
Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk (CHURCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Apr 9:rs.3.rs-3797889. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3797889/v1. Res Sq. 2024. Update in: Trials. 2024 Apr 26;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08110-z. PMID: 38659874 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Effect of Behavioral Interventions on the Uptake of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;118(10):1829-1840. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002478. Epub 2023 Aug 22. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37606070 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;15(7):1948. doi: 10.3390/cancers15071948. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37046609 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Application of artificial intelligence to the diagnosis and therapy of colorectal cancer.Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Nov 1;10(11):3575-3598. eCollection 2020. Am J Cancer Res. 2020. PMID: 33294256 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
