Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 23;5(2):244-7.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0723. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

Sites of evolutionary divergence differ between olfactory and gustatory receptors of Drosophila

Affiliations

Sites of evolutionary divergence differ between olfactory and gustatory receptors of Drosophila

Anastasia Gardiner et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Drosophila olfactory (ORs) and gustatory (GRs) receptors are evolutionarily unrelated to vertebrate ORs or nematode chemosensory receptors. Insect ORs display a reverse membrane topology compared with conventional G-protein-coupled receptors, suggesting that the mammalian scheme of chemosensory signal transduction cannot directly apply to insects. Experimental studies of GR membrane topology are lacking. We analysed the distribution of amino acid sites in GRs and ORs that show evidence for divergence under either positive selection or relaxed purifying constraints, in the genomes of 12 Drosophila species and found significant differences between these two receptor types. This suggests that insect ORs and GRs have distinct molecular properties and mechanisms of ligand recognition and/or signal transduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Distribution of the sites showing evidence of divergence by protein regions (NH2-tail, TM domains 1–7 (TM1–7), extracellular loops 1–3 (EL1–3), intracellular loops 1–3 (IL1–3), COOH-tail). (b) The overall probability of an amino acid showing evidence of divergent selection. OR, olfactory receptor (white bars); GR, gustatory receptor (black bars).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Membrane topology of receptors and distribution of selected sites: (a) OR and (b) GR. Red stars, sites with PP>0.5; yellow stars, sites with PP>0.9.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anisimova M., Bielawski J.P., Yang Z. Accuracy and power of Bayes prediction of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002;19:950–958. - PubMed
    1. Benton R., Sachse S., Michnick S.W., Vosshall L.B. Atypical membrane topology and heteromeric function of Drosophila odorant receptors in vivo. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e20. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buck L., Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell. 1991;65:175–187. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clyne P.J., Warr C.G., Freeman M.R., Lessing D., Kim J., Carlson J.R. A novel family of divergent seven-transmembrane proteins: candidate odorant receptors in Drosophila. Neuron. 1999;22:327–338. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81093-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clyne P.J., Warr C.G., Carlson J.R. Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila. Science. 2000;287:1830–1834. doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1830 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources