Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States (2001-2006): a significant survival benefit over open repair is independently associated with increased institutional volume
- PMID: 19147323
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.002
Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States (2001-2006): a significant survival benefit over open repair is independently associated with increased institutional volume
Abstract
Objective: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has gained wide acceptance for the elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), leading to interest in similar treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate national outcomes after EVAR for RAAA and to assess the effect of institutional volume metrics.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients treated with open or EVAR for RAAA, 2001-2006. Procedure volume was determined for each institution categorizing hospitals as low-, medium-, and high-volume. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes related to resource utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine independent predictors of EVAR usage and mortality.
Results: From 2001 to 2006, an estimated 27,750 hospital discharges for RAAA occurred; 11.5% were treated with EVAR. EVAR utilization increased over time (5.9% in 2001 to 18.9% in 2006, P < .0001) while overall RAAA rates remained constant. EVAR had a lower overall in-hospital mortality than open repair (31.7% vs 40.7%, P < .0001), an effect which amplified when stratified by institutional volume. On multivariable regression, open repair independently predicted mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.89). EVAR usage for RAAA increased with age (>80 years) (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.30-1.93), high elective EVAR volume (>40/y) vs medium (19-40/y) (OR 2.65; 95% CI 1.86-3.78) and low (<19/y) (OR 5.37; 95% CI 3.60-8.0). EVAR had a shorter length of stay (11.1 vs 13.8 days, P < .0001), higher discharges to home (65.1% vs 53.9%, P < .0001), and lower charges ($108,672 vs $114,784, P < .0001).
Conclusions: In the United States, for RAAA, EVAR had a lower postoperative mortality than open repair. Higher elective open repair as well as RAAA volume increased this mortality advantage for EVAR. These results support regionalization of RAAA repair to high volume centers whenever possible and a wider adoption of endovascular repair of RAAA nationwide.
Similar articles
-
Expanding use of emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: disparities in outcomes from a nationwide perspective.J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1165-70; discussion 1170-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.055. Epub 2008 Apr 3. J Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18394857
-
Surgeon case volume, not institution case volume, is the primary determinant of in-hospital mortality after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):591-599.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.063. Epub 2010 Dec 8. J Vasc Surg. 2011. PMID: 21144692
-
Thirty-day NSQIP database outcomes of open versus endoluminal repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.J Vasc Surg. 2010 Feb;51(2):305-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.086. Epub 2009 Nov 24. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 19939609
-
Endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm confers an early survival benefit over open repair.J Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct;58(4):1091-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.109. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 24075109 Review.
-
Risk-Adjusted Meta-analysis of 30-Day Mortality of Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(4):845-63. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Feb 26. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 25725271 Review.
Cited by
-
Modern management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 12;10:1323465. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1323465. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 38149264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Comparison of Endovascular and Open Surgical Treatment for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Terms of Safety and Efficacy on the Basis of a Single-Center 30-Year Experience.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 20;12(22):7186. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227186. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38002798 Free PMC article.
-
The Management of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: An Ongoing Challenge.J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 25;12(17):5530. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175530. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37685601 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Misdiagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Emergencies Occurs Frequently Among Transfers to Aortic Referral Centers: An Analysis of Over 3700 Patients.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e025026. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025026. Epub 2022 Jun 29. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35766274 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of Risk Factors and Development of Predictive Risk Score Model for Mortality after Open Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 15;58(4):549. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040549. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 35454387 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
