Effects of different shoe-lacing patterns on the biomechanics of running shoes
- PMID: 19156560
- DOI: 10.1080/02640410802482425
Effects of different shoe-lacing patterns on the biomechanics of running shoes
Abstract
In the present study, we examined the influence of shoe lacing on foot biomechanics in running. Twenty experienced rearfoot runners ran in six different lacing conditions across a force platform at a speed of 3.3 m . s(-1). Foot pronation during contact, tibial acceleration, and plantar pressure distribution of the right leg were recorded. The test conditions differed in the number of laced eyelets (1, 2, 3, 6 or 7) and in lacing tightness (weak, regular or strong). The results show reduced loading rates (P < 0.05) and pronation velocities (P < 0.01) in the tightest and highest lacing conditions. The lowest peak pressures under the heel and lateral midfoot (P < 0.01) were observed in the high (seven-eyelet) lacing pattern. Regular six-eyelet cross-lacing resulted in higher loading rates (P < 0.05) and higher peak heel pressures (P < 0.01) than seven-eyelet lacing, without any significant differences in perceived comfort. The low lace shoe conditions resulted in lower impacts (P < 0.01) and lower peak pressures under metatarsal heads III and V (P < 0.01), which is probably induced by the foot sliding within the shoe. A firm foot-to-shoe coupling with higher lacing leads to a more effective use of running shoe features and is likely to reduce the risk of lower limb injury.
Similar articles
-
Effects of different shoe-lacing patterns on dorsal pressure distribution during running and perceived comfort.Res Sports Med. 2010 Jul;18(3):176-87. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2010.490180. Res Sports Med. 2010. PMID: 20623434 Clinical Trial.
-
Changes in running mechanics using conventional shoelace versus elastic shoe cover.J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(4):373-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.534805. J Sports Sci. 2011. PMID: 21184340 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes.Ergonomics. 2008 Oct;51(10):1503-14. doi: 10.1080/00140130802239562. Ergonomics. 2008. PMID: 18803091
-
[Biomechanical considerations of impact forces and foot stability in running].Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1993 Dec;7(4):179-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993503. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1993. PMID: 8146756 Review. German.
-
Impact attenuation during weight bearing activities in barefoot vs. shod conditions: a systematic review.Gait Posture. 2013 Jun;38(2):175-86. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.017. Epub 2012 Dec 11. Gait Posture. 2013. PMID: 23245643 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating wrapping alpine ski boots during on-snow carving.Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jul 14;5:1192737. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1192737. eCollection 2023. Front Sports Act Living. 2023. PMID: 37521100 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating footwear "in the wild": Examining wrap and lace trail shoe closures during trail running.Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jan 6;4:1076609. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1076609. eCollection 2022. Front Sports Act Living. 2023. PMID: 36685056 Free PMC article.
-
Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;22(5):1722. doi: 10.3390/s22051722. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35270869 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Footwear comfort: a systematic search and narrative synthesis of the literature.J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 Dec 7;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00500-9. J Foot Ankle Res. 2021. PMID: 34876192 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bone Position and Ligament Deformations of the Foot From CT Images to Quantify the Influence of Footwear in ex vivo Feet.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jun 19;8:560. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00560. eCollection 2020. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020. PMID: 32637399 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous