Reperfusion hemorrhage following acute myocardial infarction: assessment with T2* mapping and effect on measuring the area at risk

Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):916-22. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503081154. Epub 2009 Jan 21.


Research ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of multiecho T2* mapping of the heart for detecting reperfusion hemorrhage following percutaneous primary coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute myocardial infarction, and to measure the effect of hemorrhage on quantifying the ischemic area at risk (IAR) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Fifteen patients (mean age, 59 years; 13 men, two women) were imaged a mean of 3.2 days following PPCI. The mean area of hemorrhage, indicated by a T2* decay constant of less than 20 msec, was 5.0% +/- 4.9 (standard deviation) at the level of the infarct and this correlated with the infarct (r(2) = 0.76, P < .01) and microvascular obstruction (r(2) = 0.75, P < .01) volumes. When 5% or less hemorrhage was present, the IAR was underestimated by 50% at a standard deviation threshold level of five, compared with a boundary detection tool (21.8% vs 44.0%, P < .05). T2* mapping is feasible for quantifying post-reperfusion hemorrhage and boundary detection is required to accurately assess the IAR when hemorrhage is present.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage / diagnosis*
  • Hemorrhage / etiology*
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / complications*
  • Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis*
  • Myocardial Reperfusion Injury / diagnosis*
  • Myocardial Reperfusion Injury / etiology*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity