Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Feb;57(2):273-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02103.x. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

Comparison of functional outcomes associated with hospital at home care and traditional acute hospital care

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of functional outcomes associated with hospital at home care and traditional acute hospital care

Bruce Leff et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare differences in the functional outcomes experienced by patients cared for in Hospital at Home (HaH) and traditional acute hospital care.

Design: Survey questionnaire of participants in a prospective nonrandomized clinical trial.

Setting: Three Medicare managed care health systems and a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Participants: Two hundred fourteen community-dwelling elderly patients who required acute hospital admission for community-acquired pneumonia, exacerbations of chronic heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cellulitis, 84 of whom were treated in HaH and 130 in an acute care hospital.

Intervention: Treatment in a HaH care model that substitutes for care provided in the traditional acute care hospital.

Measurements: Change in activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) scores from 1 month before admission to 2 weeks post admission to HaH or acute hospital and the proportion of groups that experienced improvement, no change, or decline in ADL and IADL scores.

Results: Patients treated in HaH experienced modest improvements in performance scores, whereas those treated in the acute care hospital declined (ADL, 0.39 vs -0.60, P=.10, range -12.0 to 7.0; IADL 0.74 vs -0.70, P=.007, range -5.0 to 10.0); a greater proportion of HaH patients improved in function and smaller proportions declined or had no change in ADLs (44% vs 25%, P=.10) or IADLs (46% vs 17%, P=.04).

Conclusion: HaH care is associated with modestly better improvements in IADL status and trends toward more improvement in ADL status than traditional acute hospital care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources