Ethanol-based cleanser versus isopropyl alcohol to decontaminate stethoscopes

Am J Infect Control. 2009 Apr;37(3):241-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.08.006. Epub 2009 Jan 30.

Abstract

Approximately 1 in 20 hospital admissions is complicated by a health care-associated infection. Stethoscopes may play a role in spreading nosocomial infections. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an ethanol-based cleanser (EBC) compared with isopropyl alcohol pads in reducing bacterial contamination of stethoscope diaphragms. Stethoscopes were cultured from medical professionals on 4 medical floors before and after cleaning with either EBC or isopropyl alcohol pads. The numbers of colony-forming units (cfu) grown were compared between the 2 cleaners and to baseline values. A total of 99 stethoscopes were cultured (49 EBC; 50 isopropyl alcohol), and all were positive for growth. After cleaning, 28.28% of the stethoscopes were growth-free (12 EBC; 16 isopropyl alcohol). Cleaning with EBC and isopropyl alcohol pads significantly reduced the cfu counts (by 92.8% and 92.5%, respectively), but neither was found to be statistically superior (F = 1.22; P = .2721). Cleaning a stethoscope diaphragm using either EBC or isopropyl alcohol led to a significant reduction in bacterial growth in culture. As an extension of the hand, a stethoscope should be cleaned with the same frequency as the hands. The simultaneous cleaning of hands and stethoscope may further increase compliance with current standards.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • 2-Propanol / pharmacology*
  • Bacteria / drug effects*
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification*
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Disinfectants / pharmacology*
  • Ethanol / pharmacology*
  • Humans
  • Stethoscopes / microbiology*

Substances

  • Disinfectants
  • Ethanol
  • 2-Propanol