Screening for skin cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 19189909
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00009
Screening for skin cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Background: Skin cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. The majority of skin cancer is nonmelanoma cancer, either basal cell cancer or squamous cell cancer. The incidence of both melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer has been increasing over the past 3 decades. In 2001, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening for skin cancer by using whole-body skin examination for early detection of skin cancer.
Purpose: To update the evidence of benefits and harms of screening for skin cancer in the general population.
Data sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane Library searches from 1 June 1999 to 9 August 2005 for English-language articles; recent systematic reviews; reference lists of retrieved articles; and expert suggestions.
Study selection: English-language studies were selected to answer the following key question: Does screening in asymptomatic persons with whole-body examination by a primary care clinician or by self-examination reduce morbidity and mortality from skin cancer? Randomized, controlled trials and case-control studies of screening for skin cancer were selected. One author selected English-language studies to answer the following contextual questions: Can screening with whole-body examination by primary care clinicians or by self-examination accurately detect skin cancer? Does screening with whole-body examination or by self-examination detect melanomas at an earlier stage (thinner lesions)?
Data extraction: All studies for the key question were reviewed, abstracted, and rated for quality by using predefined USPSTF criteria.
Data synthesis: No new evidence from controlled studies was found that addressed the benefit of screening for skin cancer with a whole-body examination by a physician. One article of fair quality, which reanalyzed data from a 1996 study identified for the 2001 report for the USPSTF, provides limited but insufficient evidence on the benefit of skin self-examination in the reduction of morbidity and mortality from melanoma.
Limitations: Direct evidence linking skin cancer screening to improved health outcomes is lacking. Information is limited on the accuracy of screening by physicians or patients using real patients and lesions.
Conclusion: The limited evidence prevents accurate estimation of the benefits of screening for skin cancer in the general primary care population.
Comment in
-
Why the evidence for skin cancer screening is insufficient: lessons from prostate cancer screening.Arch Dermatol. 2010 Mar;146(3):322-4. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.18. Arch Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20231506 Review. No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for skin cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 3;150(3):I40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19189902 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: An Updated Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jul. Report No.: 14-05210-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jul. Report No.: 14-05210-EF-1. PMID: 27583318 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for Skin Cancer: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Feb. Report No.: 09-05128-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Feb. Report No.: 09-05128-EF-1. PMID: 20722165 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for Skin Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2023 Apr. Report No.: 22-05297-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2023 Apr. Report No.: 22-05297-EF-1. PMID: 37184188 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for skin cancer.Am J Prev Med. 2001 Apr;20(3 Suppl):47-58. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00258-6. Am J Prev Med. 2001. PMID: 11306232 Review.
-
Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug. Report No.: 08-05121-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug. Report No.: 08-05121-EF-1. PMID: 20722160 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Tertiary lymphoid structures in diseases: immune mechanisms and therapeutic advances.Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024 Aug 28;9(1):225. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01947-5. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024. PMID: 39198425 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk Factors and Innovations in Risk Assessment for Melanoma, Basal Cell Carcinoma, and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;16(5):1016. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051016. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38473375 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Digital Intervention to Improve Skin Self-Examination Among Survivors of Melanoma: Protocol for a Type-1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 12;13:e52689. doi: 10.2196/52689. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38345836 Free PMC article.
-
MMS hotspots: a cross-sectional comparison of U.S. counties with and without Mohs micrographic surgery.Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Dec 7;316(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02751-x. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023. PMID: 38060044 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer overdiagnosis: a challenge in the era of screening.J Natl Cancer Cent. 2022 Dec;2(4):235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 21. J Natl Cancer Cent. 2022. PMID: 36568283 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous