Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 19200918
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60172-0
Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Some clinicians do lumbar imaging routinely or in the absence of historical or clinical features suggestive of serious low-back problems. We investigated the effects of routine, immediate lumbar imaging versus usual clinical care without immediate imaging on clinical outcomes in patients with low-back pain and no indication of serious underlying conditions.
Methods: We analysed randomised controlled trials that compared immediate lumbar imaging (radiography, MRI, or CT) versus usual clinical care without immediate imaging for low-back pain. These trials reported pain or function (primary outcomes), quality of life, mental health, overall patient-reported improvement (based on various scales), and patient satisfaction in care received. Six trials (n=1804) met inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers with criteria adapted from the Cochrane Back Review Group. Meta-analyses were done with a random effects model.
Findings: We did not record significant differences between immediate lumbar imaging and usual care without immediate imaging for primary outcomes at either short-term (up to 3 months, standardised mean difference 0.19, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.39 for pain and 0.11, -0.29 to 0.50 for function, negative values favour routine imaging) or long-term (6-12 months, -0.04, -0.15 to 0.07 for pain and 0.01, -0.17 to 0.19 for function) follow-up. Other outcomes did not differ significantly. Trial quality, use of different imaging methods, and duration of low-back pain did not affect the results, but analyses were limited by small numbers of trials. Results are most applicable to acute or subacute low-back pain assessed in primary-care settings.
Interpretation: Lumbar imaging for low-back pain without indications of serious underlying conditions does not improve clinical outcomes. Therefore, clinicians should refrain from routine, immediate lumbar imaging in patients with acute or subacute low-back pain and without features suggesting a serious underlying condition.
Comment in
-
Imaging for low-back pain.Lancet. 2009 Feb 7;373(9662):436-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60149-5. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19200903 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: Immediate routine lumbar-spine imaging does not improve clinical outcomes in low-back pain.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 16;150(12):JC6-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-02007. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19528552 No abstract available.
-
Is immediate imaging important in managing low back pain?J Athl Train. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):99-102. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.99. J Athl Train. 2011. PMID: 21214357 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Is immediate imaging important in managing low back pain?J Athl Train. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):99-102. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.99. J Athl Train. 2011. PMID: 21214357 Free PMC article.
-
The role of radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration: a randomised (unblinded) controlled trial.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(30):1-69. doi: 10.3310/hta5300. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701101 Clinical Trial.
-
Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):400-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7283.400. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11179160 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD001823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001823. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(2):CD001823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001823.pub2 Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD001823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001823.pub3 PMID: 10908512 Updated. Review.
-
Advice for the management of low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.Man Ther. 2007 Nov;12(4):310-27. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.12.009. Epub 2007 Mar 28. Man Ther. 2007. PMID: 17395522 Review.
Cited by
-
A comprehensive analysis of the machine learning pose estimation models used in human movement and posture analyses: A narrative review.Heliyon. 2024 Oct 30;10(21):e39977. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39977. eCollection 2024 Nov 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39553598 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of Artificial intelligence model in prediction of low back pain using T2 weighted MRI of Lumbar spine.F1000Res. 2024 Oct 10;13:1035. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154680.2. eCollection 2024. F1000Res. 2024. PMID: 39483709 Free PMC article.
-
How much does an MRI change over a period of up to 2 years in patients with chronic low back pain? Is a repeated MRI really necessary in the follow-up of patients with chronic low back pain?Eur Spine J. 2024 Dec;33(12):4563-4571. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08416-1. Epub 2024 Oct 11. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 39394387
-
Research trend of MRI application for lumbar disc degeneration with low back pain: a bibliometric analysis.Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 17;15:1360091. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1360091. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 38694782 Free PMC article.
-
Plain Radiography: A Unique Component of Spinal Assessment and Predictive Health.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 12;12(6):633. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060633. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38540597 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
