Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 168 (5), 571-9

Arctiid Moth Clicks Can Degrade the Accuracy of Range Difference Discrimination in Echolocating Big Brown Bats, Eptesicus Fuscus

Affiliations

Arctiid Moth Clicks Can Degrade the Accuracy of Range Difference Discrimination in Echolocating Big Brown Bats, Eptesicus Fuscus

L A Miller. J Comp Physiol A.

Abstract

Four big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) born and raised in captivity were trained using the Yes/No psychophysical method to report whether a virtual sonar target was at a standard distance or not. At threshold bats were able to detect a minimum range difference of 6 mm (a delta t of 36 microseconds). Following threshold determinations, a click burst 1.8 ms long containing 5 pulses from the ruby tiger moth, Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Arctiidae), was presented randomly after each phantom echo. The sound energy of the click burst was -4 dB relative to that of the phantom echo. Clicks presented for the very first time could startle naive bats to different degrees depending on the individual. The bats' performance deteriorated by as much as 4000% when the click burst started within a window of about 1.5 ms before the phantom echo. Even when one of ten phantom echoes was preceded by a click burst, the range difference discrimination worsened by 200%. Hence, clicks falling within the 1.5 ms time window seem to interfere with the bat's neural timing mechanism. The clicks of arctiid moths appear to serve 3 functions: they can startle naive bats, interfere with range difference determinations, or they can signal the moth's distastefulness, as shown in earlier studies.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 13 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hear Res. 1981 Nov;5(2-3):317-35 - PubMed

References

    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Sep;86(3):961-70 - PubMed

References

    1. Hear Res. 1989 Sep;41(2-3):255-64 - PubMed

References

    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Oct;86(4):1318-32 - PubMed

References

    1. Science. 1965 Jan 8;147(3654):173-4 - PubMed

References

    1. Toxicon. 1970 Nov;8(4):293-9 - PubMed

References

    1. Science. 1978 Nov 10;202(4368):645-8 - PubMed

References

    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Jul;72(1):74-9 - PubMed

References

    1. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Oct;48(4):1011-32 - PubMed

References

    1. Hear Res. 1988 Nov;36(2-3):107-24 - PubMed

References

    1. J Neurosci. 1982 Jan;2(1):17-31 - PubMed

References

    1. J Comp Physiol A. 1986 Oct;159(4):559-67 - PubMed

References

    1. Science. 1970 Oct 23;170(3956):449-52 - PubMed

References

    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Feb;83(2):662-8 - PubMed

References

    1. J Neurophysiol. 1977 Jul;40(4):926-42 - PubMed

References

    1. Z Tierpsychol. 1968 Mar;25(2):129-38 - PubMed

References

    1. J Comp Physiol A. 1990 Feb;166(4):449-70 - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback