Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters (WARP): an open-label randomised trial
- PMID: 19217991
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60205-1
Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters (WARP): an open-label randomised trial
Abstract
Background: The role and dose of anticoagulants in thromboprophylaxis for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy through central venous catheters (CVCs) is controversial. We therefore assessed whether warfarin reduces catheter-related thrombosis compared with no warfarin and whether the dose of warfarin determines the thromboprophylactic effect.
Methods: In 68 clinical centres in the UK, we randomly assigned 1590 patients aged at least 16 years with cancer who were receiving chemotherapy through CVCs to no warfarin, fixed-dose warfarin 1 mg per day, or dose-adjusted warfarin per day to maintain an international normalised ratio between 1.5 and 2.0. Clinicians who were certain of the benefit of warfarin randomly assigned patients to fixed-dose or dose-adjusted warfarin groups. The primary outcome was the rate of radiologically proven, symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN 50312145.
Findings: Compared with no warfarin (n=404), warfarin (n=408; 324 [79%] on fixed-dose and 84 [21%] on dose-adjusted) did not reduce the rate of catheter-related thromboses (24 [6%] vs 24 [6%]; relative risk 0.99, 95% CI 0.57-1.72, p=0.98). However, compared with fixed-dose warfarin (n=471), dose-adjusted warfarin (n=473) was superior in the prevention of catheter-related thromboses (13 [3%] vs 34 [7%]; 0.38, 0.20-0.71, p=0.002). Major bleeding events were rare; an excess was noted with warfarin compared with no warfarin (7 vs 1, p=0.07) and with dose-adjusted warfarin compared with fixed-dose warfarin (16 vs 7, p=0.09). A combined endpoint of thromboses and major bleeding showed no difference between comparisons. We did not note a survival benefit in either comparison.
Interpretation: The findings show that prophylactic warfarin compared with no warfarin is not associated with a reduction in symptomatic catheter-related or other thromboses in patients with cancer and therefore we should consider newer treatments.
Funding: Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK.
Comment in
-
Prophylaxis of catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients.Lancet. 2009 Feb 14;373(9663):523-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60178-1. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19217973 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer did not reduce risk for catheter-related thrombosis.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):JC1-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-02005. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19620149 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Superior venocaval obstruction secondary to central venous catheter-related thromboses in two patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving weekly 5-flurouracil. Should adjusted-dose warfarin be used as thromboprophylaxis?Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2002 Dec;13(8):749-53. doi: 10.1097/00001721-200212000-00012. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2002. PMID: 12441915
-
Thrombosis prophylaxis in patient populations with a central venous catheter: a systematic review.Arch Intern Med. 2003 Sep 8;163(16):1913-21. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.16.1913. Arch Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12963564 Review.
-
Prophylaxis of catheter-related deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients with low-dose warfarin, low molecular weight heparin, or control: a randomized, controlled, phase III study.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;72(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2169-y. Epub 2013 May 1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23636449 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized placebo-controlled study of low-dose warfarin for the prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis in patients with cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4063-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.192. Epub 2005 Mar 14. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15767639 Clinical Trial.
-
Thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;99(1):38-43. doi: 10.1160/TH07-07-0446. Thromb Haemost. 2008. PMID: 18217132 Review.
Cited by
-
Anticoagulation for the Prevention of Arterial Thrombosis in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JACC CardioOncol. 2023 Jun 27;5(4):520-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.04.003. eCollection 2023 Aug. JACC CardioOncol. 2023. PMID: 37614584 Free PMC article.
-
Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 18;7(7):CD008462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35849083 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Malignancies: Daily Practice Recommendations by the Hemostasis Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO), the Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research (GTH), and the Austrian Society of Hematology and Oncology (ÖGHO).Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 10;13(12):2905. doi: 10.3390/cancers13122905. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34200741 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Jan;10(1):102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 2. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022. PMID: 34089941 Free PMC article.
-
American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer.Blood Adv. 2021 Feb 23;5(4):927-974. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003442. Blood Adv. 2021. PMID: 33570602 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
