Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;21(2):145-50.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp005. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects

Affiliations

Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects

Dale M Needham et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The results of many quality improvement (QI) projects are gaining wide-spread attention. Policy-makers, hospital leaders and clinicians make important decisions based on the assumption that QI project results are accurate. However, compared with clinical research, QI projects are typically conducted with substantially fewer resources, potentially impacting data quality. Our objective was to provide a primer on basic data quality control methods appropriate for QI efforts.

Methods: Data quality control methods should be applied throughout all phases of a QI project. In the design phase, project aims should guide data collection decisions, emphasizing quality (rather than quantity) of data and considering resource limitations. In the data collection phase, standardized data collection forms, comprehensive staff training and a well-designed database can help maximize the quality of the data. Clearly defined data elements, quality assurance reviews of both collection and entry and system-based controls reduce the likelihood of error. In the data management phase, missing data should be quickly identified and corrected with system-based controls to minimize the missing data. Finally, in the data analysis phase, appropriate statistical methods and sensitivity analysis aid in managing and understanding the effects of missing data and outliers, in addressing potential confounders and in conveying the precision of results.

Conclusion: Data quality control is essential to ensure the integrity of results from QI projects. Feasible methods are available and important to help ensure that stakeholder's decisions are based on accurate data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample online data entry form.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Werner RM, Bradlow ET, Asch DA. Hospital performance measures and quality of care. LDI Issue Brief. 2008;13:1–4. - PubMed
    1. Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, et al. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:486–96. - PubMed
    1. Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy MM, et al. Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299:2294–303. - PubMed
    1. Werner RM, Asch DA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293:1239–44. - PubMed
    1. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Goeschel CA. Improving the quality of measurement and evaluation in quality improvement efforts. Am J Med Qual. 2008;23:143–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms