Avoiding common technical errors in subclavian central venous catheter placement
- PMID: 19228511
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.025
Avoiding common technical errors in subclavian central venous catheter placement
Abstract
Background: Proficiency in placing infraclavicular subclavian venous catheters can be achieved through practice and repetition. But few data specifically document insertion technical errors, which mentors could teach novice operators to avoid.
Study design: Surgical, medical, and anesthesia textbooks and procedural handbooks were reviewed. Subclavian catheter placement technical errors described were identified and consolidated. Video captures from 86 consecutive patients receiving subclavian central venous catheterizations at an urban trauma center were evaluated. In each video segment, the number of attempts at insertion, the number of failures at insertion, and the technical error observed during failed attempts were recorded and tabulated.
Results: Of the 86 subclavian line placements attempted, 77 were successful (89.5%), with a total of 357 subclavian venipuncture attempts and 279 failures (78% attempt failure rate). There was a mean of 3.2 failed attempts per line (left side, 2.1 attempts; right side, 5.5 attempts). Junior residents (PGY 1 to 2) had more failures per line than senior residents (PGY 3 to 5): 4.1 versus 3.6. The most common technical errors observed were improper site for needle insertion relative to the clavicle; insertion of the needle through the clavicular periosteum; too shallow of a trajectory for the needle; improper or inadequate anatomic landmark identification; aiming the needle too cephalad; and inadvertent movement of the needle out of the vein before or during wire placement.
Conclusions: In subclavian central venous access attempts, there are six common technical errors. Mentors can improve novice operators' proficiency by teaching them to avoid these errors.
Similar articles
-
Long-term central venous catheters: size and location do matter.Am J Surg. 2006 Mar;191(3):396-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.044. Am J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16490554
-
Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit.Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2697-701. Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19885989
-
Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.Transfus Apher Sci. 2003 Feb;28(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/S1473-0502(02)00094-0. Transfus Apher Sci. 2003. PMID: 12620263 Clinical Trial.
-
Relationship Between Technical Errors and Decision-Making Skills in the Junior Resident.J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e84-e90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Sep 23. J Surg Educ. 2016. PMID: 27671618 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ectopic intra-aortic insertion of a subclavian central venous catheter: case report and review of the literature.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 May;127(5):1515-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.021. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 15116018 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Lung deflation while placing a subclavian vein catheter: Our experience in minimizing the risk of pneumothorax.PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0281300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281300. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36730282 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of ultrasound guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterizations in adult patients.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):411-416. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_400_20. Epub 2022 Feb 24. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36505187 Free PMC article.
-
Deployment of a Covered Stent for Left Internal Mammary Perforation From Percutaneous Pacemaker Implantation.CJC Open. 2020 Jul 14;2(6):708-710. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.06.018. eCollection 2020 Nov. CJC Open. 2020. PMID: 33305234 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a Novel Bony Landmark-Based Method for Teaching Percutaneous Insertion of Subclavian Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients.World J Surg. 2019 Aug;43(8):2106-2113. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04997-x. World J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30953198
-
[Catheterization of the subclavian vein and the risk of pneumothorax : Mechanical ventilation increases the risk of pneumothorax during infraclavicular landmark-guided subclavian vein puncture: a prospective randomized study].Anaesthesist. 2019 May;68(5):309-316. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0579-x. Anaesthesist. 2019. PMID: 30899972 German.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
