Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. Mar-Apr 2009;29(2):207-16.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X08327397. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

Value for Money in Changing Clinical Practice: Should Decisions About Guidelines and Implementation Strategies Be Made Sequentially or Simultaneously?

Affiliations

Value for Money in Changing Clinical Practice: Should Decisions About Guidelines and Implementation Strategies Be Made Sequentially or Simultaneously?

Ties Hoomans et al. Med Decis Making. .

Abstract

Decisions about clinical practice change, that is, which guidelines to adopt and how to implement them, can be made sequentially or simultaneously. Decision makers adopting a sequential approach first compare the costs and effects of alternative guidelines to select the best set of guideline recommendations for patient management and subsequently examine the implementation costs and effects to choose the best strategy to implement the selected guideline. In an integral approach, decision makers simultaneously decide about the guideline and the implementation strategy on the basis of the overall value for money in changing clinical practice. This article demonstrates that the decision to use a sequential v. an integral approach affects the need for detailed information and the complexity of the decision analytic process. More importantly, it may lead to different choices of guidelines and implementation strategies for clinical practice change. The differences in decision making and decision analysis between the alternative approaches are comprehensively illustrated using 2 hypothetical examples. We argue that, in most cases, an integral approach to deciding about change in clinical practice is preferred, as this provides more efficient use of scarce health-care resources.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 4 articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback