Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 17 (8), 880-6

Differences in Graft Orientation Using the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Technique in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in Graft Orientation Using the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Technique in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Michael Elias Hantes et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in graft orientation between transtibial (TT) and anteromedial (AM) portal technique using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Fifty-six patients who were undergoing ACL reconstruction underwent MRI of their healthy and reconstructed knee. Thirty patients had ACL reconstruction using the TT (group A), while in the remaining 26 the AM (group B) was used. In the femoral part graft orientation was evaluated in the coronal plane using the femoral graft angle (FGA). The FGA was defined as the angle between the axis of the femoral tunnel and the joint line. In the tibial part graft orientation was evaluated in the sagittal plane using the tibial graft angle (TGA). The TGA was defined as the angle between the axis of the tibial tunnel and a line perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia. The ACL angle of the normal knee in the sagittal view was also calculated. The mean FGA for group A was 72 degrees, while for the group B was 53 degrees and this was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean TGA for group A was 64 degrees, while for the group B was 63 degrees (P = 0.256). The mean intact ACL angle for group A was 52 degrees, while for the group B was 51 degrees. The difference between TGA and intact ACL angle was statistically significant (P < 0.001) for both groups. Using the AM portal technique, the ACL graft is placed in a more oblique direction in comparison with the TT technique in the femoral part. However, there are no differences between the two techniques in graft orientation in the tibial part. Normal sagittal obliquity is not restored with both techniques.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 25 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999 May-Jun;7(3):189-98 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2006 May;34(5):787-92 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):843-5 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2004 Mar;20(3):294-9 - PubMed
    1. Knee. 2008 Oct;15(5):364-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback