Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;195(5):463-72.
doi: 10.1007/s00359-009-0424-9. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

Spatial unmasking in the echolocating Big Brown Bat, Eptesicus fuscus

Affiliations

Spatial unmasking in the echolocating Big Brown Bat, Eptesicus fuscus

Susan Sümer et al. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009 May.

Abstract

Masking affects the ability of echolocating bats to detect a target in the presence of clutter targets. It can be reduced by spatially separating the targets. Spatial unmasking was measured in a two-alternative-forced-choice detection experiment with four Big Brown Bats detecting a wire at 1 m distance. Depth dependent spatial unmasking was investigated by the bats detecting a wire with a diameter of 1.2 mm in front of a masker with a threshold distance of 11 cm behind the wire. For angle dependent spatial unmasking the masker was turned laterally, starting from its threshold position at 11 cm. With increasing masker angles the bats could detect thinner wires with diameters decreasing from 1.2 mm (target strength -36.8 dB) at 0 degrees to 0.2 mm (target strength -63.0 dB) at 22 degrees. Without masker, the bats detected wire diameters of 0.16 mm (target strength -66.2 dB), reached with masker positions beyond 23 degrees (complete masking release). Analysis of the sonar signals indicated strategies in the echolocation behavior. The bats enhanced the second harmonics of their signals. This may improve the spatial separation between wire and masker due to frequency-dependent directionality increase of sound emission and echo reception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 May;109(5 Pt 1):2112-22 - PubMed
    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Nov;114(5):2856-70 - PubMed
    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Nov;112(5 Pt 1):2086-98 - PubMed
    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Feb;91(2):1150-63 - PubMed
    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan;107(1):625-37 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources