Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review
- PMID: 19279318
- DOI: 10.1177/1077558709332440
Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review
Abstract
This review assessed the use of electronic medical record (EMR) systems in outcomes research. We systematically searched PubMed to identify articles published from January 2000 to January 2007 involving EMR use for outpatient-based outcomes research in the United States. EMR-based outcomes research studies (n = 126) have increased sixfold since 2000. Although chronic conditions were most common, EMRs were also used to study less common diseases, highlighting the EMRs' flexibility to examine large cohorts as well as identify patients with rare diseases. Traditional multi-variate modeling techniques were the most commonly used technique to address confounding and potential selection bias. Data validation was a component in a quarter of studies, and many evaluated the EMR's ability to achieve similar results previously achieved using other data sources. Investigators using EMR data should aim for consistent terminology, focus on adequately describing their methods, and consider appropriate statistical methods to control for confounding and treatment-selection bias.
Similar articles
-
Application of electronic medical record data for health outcomes research: a review of recent literature.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Apr;13(2):191-200. doi: 10.1586/erp.13.7. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013. PMID: 23570430 Review.
-
Asthma electronic medical records in primary care: an integrative review.J Asthma. 2010 Oct;47(8):895-912. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2010.4911411. J Asthma. 2010. PMID: 20854201 Review.
-
Using your electronic medical record for research: a primer for avoiding pitfalls.Fam Pract. 2010 Feb;27(1):121-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp068. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Fam Pract. 2010. PMID: 19828572
-
Clinical research using an information system: the multicenter perioperative outcomes group.Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Sep;29(3):377-88. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.06.002. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011. PMID: 21871400 Review.
-
Using electronic medical records to reduce errors and risks in a prenatal network.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;21(6):527-31. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332d171. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19797949 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Embeddings From Diagnosis Codes for Health Care Prediction Tasks: Pat2Vec Machine Learning Framework.JMIR AI. 2023 Apr 21;2:e40755. doi: 10.2196/40755. JMIR AI. 2023. PMID: 38875541 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Sequential Hot-Deck Imputation for Missing Health Care Systems Data for Population Health Research.Med Care. 2024 May 1;62(5):319-325. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001995. Epub 2024 Mar 28. Med Care. 2024. PMID: 38546379
-
Understanding data provenance when using electronic medical records for research: Lessons learned from the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database.Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Sep 27;8(5):2177. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i5.2177. eCollection 2023. Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023. PMID: 38425492 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e51003. doi: 10.2196/51003. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 38100185 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Research data warehouse: using electronic health records to conduct population-based observational studies.JAMIA Open. 2023 Jun 21;6(2):ooad039. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad039. eCollection 2023 Jul. JAMIA Open. 2023. PMID: 37359950 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
