Primary care physicians' reported use of pre-screening discussions for prostate cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey
- PMID: 19296843
- PMCID: PMC2666644
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-19
Primary care physicians' reported use of pre-screening discussions for prostate cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Background: Professional medical organizations recommend individualized patient decision making about prostate cancer screening. Little is known about primary care physicians' use of pre-screening discussions to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening. The aim of this study is to explore physicians' use of pre-screening discussions and reasons why physicians would or would not try to persuade patients to be screened if they initially refuse testing.
Methods: Primary care physicians completed a self-administered survey about prostate cancer screening practices for informed decision making.
Results: Sixty-six physicians (75.9%) completed the survey, and 63 were used in the analysis. Thirteen physicians (20.6%) reported not using prescreening discussions, 45 (71.4%) reported the use of prescreening discussions, and 3 (4.8%) reported neither ordering the PSA test nor discussing it with patients. Sixty-nine percent of physicians who reported not having discussions indicated they were more likely to screen African American patients for prostate cancer, compared to 50% of physicians who reported the use of discussions (Chi-square(1) = 1.62, p = .20). Similarly, 91% of physicians who reported not having discussions indicated they are more likely to screen patients with a family history of prostate cancer, compared to 46% of those who reported the use of discussion (Chi-square(1) = 13.27, p < .001). Beliefs about the scientific evidence and efficacy of screening, ethical concerns regarding patient autonomy, and concerns about time constraints differed between physicians who would and would not try to persuade a patient to be tested.
Conclusion: Although guidelines recommend discussing the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening, physicians report varying practice styles. Future research needs to consider the nature of discussions and the degree to which informed decision making is being achieved in clinical practice.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Primary care physicians' use of an informed decision-making process for prostate cancer screening.Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;11(1):67-74. doi: 10.1370/afm.1445. Ann Fam Med. 2013. PMID: 23319508 Free PMC article.
-
Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study.J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jul;22(7):901-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0142-3. J Gen Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17549576 Free PMC article.
-
African american primary care physicians' prostate cancer screening practices.J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):36-43. doi: 10.1177/2150131913507454. Epub 2013 Oct 17. J Prim Care Community Health. 2014. PMID: 24327595 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate specific antigen testing policy worldwide varies greatly and seems not to be in accordance with guidelines: a systematic review.BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Oct 11;13:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-100. BMC Fam Pract. 2012. PMID: 23052017 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared medical decision in prostate cancer screening in primary care: a systematic literature review of current evidence.Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jul;56(7):2251-2259. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-03947-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 38316684 Review.
Cited by
-
Limited Evidence of Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Audio-Recorded Primary Care Visits Among Black Men and their Healthcare Providers.J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Oct;26(5):866-877. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01606-5. Epub 2024 Jun 1. J Immigr Minor Health. 2024. PMID: 38822923 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a rapid psychosocial well-being screening tool in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Jun 10;9(3):303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.002. eCollection 2022 Jul. Int J Nurs Sci. 2022. PMID: 35891904 Free PMC article.
-
Primary goals, information-giving and men's understanding: a qualitative study of Australian and UK doctors' varied communication about PSA screening.BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e018009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018009. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29362252 Free PMC article.
-
US Primary Care Physicians' Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk.Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2014 Jan 1;1:2333392814562909. doi: 10.1177/2333392814562909. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 27104210 Free PMC article.
-
Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8. J Cancer Educ. 2016. PMID: 26498649 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lin K, Lipsitz R, Miller T, Janakiraman S, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:192–9. - PubMed
-
- O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, Tetroe J, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Entwistle V, Rostom A, Fiset V, Barry M, Jones J. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003:CD001431. - PubMed
-
- Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, Levin B, Byers T, Rothenberger D, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001 – testing for early lung cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:38–75. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.51.1.38. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
