The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection
- PMID: 19297344
- DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.108233
The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection
Erratum in
-
Correction: The development of assessment of SpondyloArthritis international society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):e59. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.108233corr1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 31088800 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To validate and refine two sets of candidate criteria for the classification/diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).
Methods: All Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) members were invited to include consecutively new patients with chronic (> or =3 months) back pain of unknown origin that began before 45 years of age. The candidate criteria were first tested in the entire cohort of 649 patients from 25 centres, and then refined in a random selection of 40% of cases and thereafter validated in the remaining 60%.
Results: Upon diagnostic work-up, axial SpA was diagnosed in 60.2% of the cohort. Of these, 70% did not fulfil modified New York criteria and, therefore, were classified as having "non-radiographic" axial SpA. Refinement of the candidate criteria resulted in new ASAS classification criteria that are defined as: the presence of sacroiliitis by radiography or by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plus at least one SpA feature ("imaging arm") or the presence of HLA-B27 plus at least two SpA features ("clinical arm"). The sensitivity and specificity of the entire set of the new criteria were 82.9% and 84.4%, and for the imaging arm alone 66.2% and 97.3%, respectively. The specificity of the new criteria was much better than that of the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group criteria modified for MRI (sensitivity 85.1%, specificity 65.1%) and slightly better than that of the modified Amor criteria (sensitivity 82.9, specificity 77.5%).
Conclusion: The new ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA can reliably classify patients for clinical studies and may help rheumatologists in clinical practice in diagnosing axial SpA in those with chronic back pain.
Trial registration number: NCT00328068.
Comment in
-
Diagnosing axial spondyloarthropathy. The new Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria: MRI entering centre stage.Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):765-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.111435. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009. PMID: 19435721 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part I): classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal.Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):770-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.108217. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009. PMID: 19297345
-
How should we diagnose spondyloarthritis according to the ASAS classification criteria: a guide for practicing physicians.Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2010 Nov;120(11):452-7. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2010. PMID: 21102381
-
Evaluation of Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis in Chinese patients with chronic back pain: results of a 2-year follow-up study.Int J Rheum Dis. 2014 Sep;17(7):782-9. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12381. Epub 2014 Jun 9. Int J Rheum Dis. 2014. PMID: 24912101
-
A critical overview of the imaging arm of the ASAS criteria for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis: what the radiologist should know.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):555-65. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5732-12.0. Epub 2012 Apr 6. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22484991 Review.
-
Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis/axial spondyloarthritis.Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Oct;24(5):589-604. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.05.007. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010. PMID: 21035082 Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in medications for autoimmune disorders during pregnancy and factors for their discontinuation: a population-based study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06932-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 39563243 Free PMC article.
-
A guideline on biomarkers in the diagnosis and evaluation in axial spondyloarthritis.Front Immunol. 2024 Oct 30;15:1394148. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1394148. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39539543 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A comparison of comorbidities and their risk factors prevalence across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis with focus on cardiovascular diseases: data from a single center real-world cohort.Rheumatol Int. 2024 Nov 11. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05740-z. Online ahead of print. Rheumatol Int. 2024. PMID: 39527279
-
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Exercise Benefits/ Barriers Scale: Perceived exercise benefits and barriers of patients with different axial spondyloarthritis subtypes.Arch Rheumatol. 2024 Aug 26;39(3):447-458. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10720. eCollection 2024 Sep. Arch Rheumatol. 2024. PMID: 39507848 Free PMC article.
-
Difficult-to-treat axial spondyloarthritis patients.Arch Rheumatol. 2024 Aug 26;39(3):419-428. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10567. eCollection 2024 Sep. Arch Rheumatol. 2024. PMID: 39507846 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials