Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;15(3):189-93.

Medicare Part D coverage gap and diabetes beneficiaries

Affiliations

Medicare Part D coverage gap and diabetes beneficiaries

Julie A Schmittdiel et al. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To examine drug costs and entry and exit rates into the Part D coverage gap for beneficiaries with diabetes in Medicare Advantage managed care plans.

Study design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Methods: Study patients were Medicare Advantage Part D beneficiaries with diabetes from 2 large California health plans who were continuously enrolled in 2006 and had a drug coverage gap starting at $2250. Entry and exit into the gap, total drug costs, and out-of-pocket drug costs were determined using pharmacy databases.

Results: In 2006, 26% of the 42,801 beneficiaries with diabetes reached the coverage gap; 2% of beneficiaries exited the gap and qualified for catastrophic coverage. Beneficiaries incurred a mean of $2182 in total drug costs during 2006. Drug expenditures remained stable over the year for beneficiaries who did not enter the gap. For beneficiaries who entered the gap, total drug costs were higher overall and decreased at year's end as out-of-pocket expenses increased.

Conclusions: Fewer diabetes patients in this study entered the coverage gap than had been previously estimated, but the entry rate was much higher than that of the general Medicare Advantage Part D population. Patients entering the gap had lower subsequent monthly drug expenditures; this may be due to lower-than-expected drug prices and greater use of generics in managed care, or it may potentially signal poorer drug adherence. Future work should examine these hypotheses and explore risk factors for entering the Part D coverage gap.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative Percent of Patients Reaching Medicare Part D Coverage Gap in 2006, by Month
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average Per-Patient Quarterly Total Drug Costs in 2006

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neuman P, Strollo MK, Guterman S, et al. Medicare prescription drug benefit progress report: findings from a 2006 national survey of seniors. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w630–643. - PubMed
    1. Safran DG, Neuman P, Schoen C, et al. Prescription drug coverage and seniors: findings from a 2003 national survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 Jan-Jun;:W5–152. W155–166. Suppl Web Exclusives. - PubMed
    1. Soumerai SB, Pierre-Jacques M, Zhang F, et al. Cost-related medication nonadherence among elderly and disabled Medicare beneficiaries: a national survey 1 year before the Medicare drug benefit. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1829–1835. - PubMed
    1. Bach PB, McClellan MB. A prescription for a modern Medicare program. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 29;353(26):2733–2735. - PubMed
    1. Bach PB, McClellan MB. The first months of the prescription-drug benefit— CMS update. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 1;354(22):2312–2314. - PubMed

Publication types