Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials
- PMID: 19303634
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60552-3
Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are alternative treatments for multivessel coronary disease. Although the procedures have been compared in several randomised trials, their long-term effects on mortality in key clinical subgroups are uncertain. We undertook a collaborative analysis of data from randomised trials to assess whether the effects of the procedures on mortality are modified by patient characteristics.
Methods: We pooled individual patient data from ten randomised trials to compare the effectiveness of CABG with PCI according to patients' baseline clinical characteristics. We used stratified, random effects Cox proportional hazards models to test the effect on all-cause mortality of randomised treatment assignment and its interaction with clinical characteristics. All analyses were by intention to treat.
Findings: Ten participating trials provided data on 7812 patients. PCI was done with balloon angioplasty in six trials and with bare-metal stents in four trials. Over a median follow-up of 5.9 years (IQR 5.0-10.0), 575 (15%) of 3889 patients assigned to CABG died compared with 628 (16%) of 3923 patients assigned to PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-1.02; p=0.12). In patients with diabetes (CABG, n=615; PCI, n=618), mortality was substantially lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group (HR 0.70, 0.56-0.87); however, mortality was similar between groups in patients without diabetes (HR 0.98, 0.86-1.12; p=0.014 for interaction). Patient age modified the effect of treatment on mortality, with hazard ratios of 1.25 (0.94-1.66) in patients younger than 55 years, 0.90 (0.75-1.09) in patients aged 55-64 years, and 0.82 (0.70-0.97) in patients 65 years and older (p=0.002 for interaction). Treatment effect was not modified by the number of diseased vessels or other baseline characteristics.
Interpretation: Long-term mortality is similar after CABG and PCI in most patient subgroups with multivessel coronary artery disease, so choice of treatment should depend on patient preferences for other outcomes. CABG might be a better option for patients with diabetes and patients aged 65 years or older because we found mortality to be lower in these subgroups.
Comment in
-
PCI or CABG in coronary artery disease?Lancet. 2009 Apr 4;373(9670):1150-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60574-2. Epub 2009 Mar 19. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19303631 No abstract available.
-
CABG versus PCI for multivessel coronary artery disease.Lancet. 2009 Jun 27;373(9682):2199-200; author reply 2200. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61191-0. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19560600 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: CABG and percutaneous coronary intervention do not differ for long-term mortality in multivessel coronary artery disease.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):JC1-8, JC1-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-02008. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19620152 No abstract available.
-
Comparative effectiveness of multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 17;159(6):435. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00016. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 24042375 No abstract available.
-
Comparative effectiveness of multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 17;159(6):435. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00017. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 24042376 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The effect of age on outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery compared with balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stent implantation among patients with multivessel coronary disease. A collaborative analysis of individual patient data from 10 randomized trials.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 20;60(21):2150-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.982. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 23153843 Clinical Trial.
-
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010. PMID: 19797974
-
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 29478841 Review.
-
Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in the bare-metal stent era.Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S199-209. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735902. Circulation. 2008. PMID: 18824755
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):223-30. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24296767 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Early Invasive Strategy on Left Ventricular Function Recovery in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients in Pakistan.Cureus. 2024 Aug 25;16(8):e67778. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67778. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39323671 Free PMC article.
-
Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Revascularization: Comparing Outcomes Between Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66166. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66166. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39233965 Free PMC article.
-
Current Landscape and Future Directions of Coronary Revascularization in Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure: A Review.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Dec 4;2(6Part B):101197. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101197. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023. PMID: 39131064 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The characteristic of acute coronary syndromes of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in centers with and without cardiac surgery on-site.Cardiol J. 2024;31(4):546-552. doi: 10.5603/cj.95152. Epub 2024 Jan 22. Cardiol J. 2024. PMID: 38247436 Free PMC article.
-
Functional (Re)Development of SYNTAX Score II 2020: Predictive Performance and Risk Assessment.J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 8;12(18):5844. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185844. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37762785 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
