Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 May;24(5):614-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0955-3. Epub 2009 Mar 24.

Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system

Yeuen Kim  1 , Alice Hm Chen, Ellen Keith, Hal F Yee Jr, Margot B Kushel
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system

Yeuen Kim et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 May.

Abstract

Background: Electronic referrals can improve access to subspecialty care in safety net settings. In January 2007, San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) launched an electronic referral portal that incorporated subspecialist triage, iterative communication with referring providers, and existing electronic health record data to improve access to subspecialty care.

Objective: We surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) to assess the impact of electronic referrals on workflow and clinical care.

Design: We administered an 18-item, web-based questionnaire to all 368 PCPs who had the option of referring to SFGH.

Measurements: We asked participants to rate time spent submitting a referral, guidance of workup, wait times, and change in overall clinical care compared to prior referral methods using 5-point Likert scales. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify variables associated with perceived improvement in overall clinical care.

Results: Two hundred ninety-eight PCPs (81.0%) from 24 clinics participated. Over half (55.4%) worked at hospital-based clinics, 27.9% at county-funded community clinics, and 17.1% at non-county-funded community clinics. Most (71.9%) reported that electronic referrals had improved overall clinical care. Providers from non-county-funded clinics (AOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14-0.79) and those who spent > or =6 min submitting an electronic referral (AOR 0.33, 95%CI 0.18-0.61) were significantly less likely than other participants to report that electronic referrals had improved clinical care.

Conclusions: PCPs felt electronic referrals improved health-care access and quality; those who reported a negative impact on workflow were less likely to agree. While electronic referrals hold promise as a tool to improve clinical care, their impact on workflow should be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PCPs’ ratings of attributes of electronic referrals compared to prior referral methods.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10345255', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10345255/'}]}
    2. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff. Clin. Pract. 1998;1:2-4. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '25077222', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25077222/'}]}
    2. Ein Lewin M, Altman SH. America's health care safety net: intact but endangered. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2000. - PubMed
    1. Smith SM, Allwright S, O'Dowd T. Effectiveness of shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in chronic disease management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD004910. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/s11606-007-0383-1', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0383-1'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC2359526', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2359526/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '18373130', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18373130/'}]}
    2. Fischer MA, Vogeli C, Stedman MR, Ferris TG, Weissman JS. Uptake of electronic prescribing in community-based practices. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:358-63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/s11606-007-0488-6', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0488-6'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC2359517', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2359517/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '18373132', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18373132/'}]}
    2. Leu MG, Cheung M, Webster TR, et al. Centers speak up: the clinical context for health information technology in the ambulatory care setting. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:372-8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms