Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;47(4):431-9.
doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e318190ccac.

Insurance continuity and receipt of diabetes preventive care in a network of federally qualified health centers

Affiliations

Insurance continuity and receipt of diabetes preventive care in a network of federally qualified health centers

Rachel Gold et al. Med Care. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Having health insurance is usually associated with better access to care and better health outcomes. For patients receiving care at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), where care is provided regardless of insurance status, the role health insurance status plays in affecting receipt of services is less well understood.

Research design: We used practice management data from a coalition of FQHCs in Oregon, and linked to Oregon's electronic insurance data, to examine whether receipt of diabetes preventive care services was associated with continuity of insurance coverage among adult FQHC patients receiving diabetes care in 2005.

Results: About one-third (32%) of patients with diabetes received a flu vaccination in 2005, 36% an LDL screening, 54% at least 1 HbA1c screening, and 21% a nephropathy screening. Compared with the continuously insured, the continuously uninsured were less likely to receive an LDL screening, a flu vaccination, and/or a nephropathy screening; those with partial coverage were less likely than the continuously insured to receive a flu shot, at least 1 HbA1c screening, or an LDL screening.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that FQHCs do an excellent job in delivering most services to their uninsured and partially insured patients, but also underscore that for diabetic patients from underserved communities, having both an FQHC medical home and continuous health insurance plays a critical role in receiving optimal chronic disease management. Our study is one of the first to demonstrate how electronic administrative data from a network of FQHCs can be successfully used to gauge the state of healthcare delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NACHC. The Safety Net on the Edge. 2008. [Accessed 5-21-0008]. Available at: http://www.nachc.com/client/documents/issues-advocacy/policy-library/res....
    1. Dievler A, Giovannini T. Community health centers: promise and performance. Medical Care Research & Review. 1998;55:405–431. - PubMed
    1. O’Malley AS, Forrest CB, Politzer RM, et al. Health center trends, 1994–2001: what do they portend for the federal growth initiative? Health Affairs. 2005;24:465–472. - PubMed
    1. US DHHS. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2005. 2008. [Accessed 5-21-0008.]. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr05/nhdr05.htm.
    1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2005. - PubMed

Publication types