Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):474-84.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00007.

Systematic review: association of low-density lipoprotein subfractions with cardiovascular outcomes

Affiliations
Review

Systematic review: association of low-density lipoprotein subfractions with cardiovascular outcomes

Stanley Ip et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Measures of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions have been proposed as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

Purpose: To review published studies that reported relationships between LDL subfractions and cardiovascular outcomes.

Data sources: MEDLINE (1950 to 5 January 2009), CAB Abstracts (1973 to 30 June 2008), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2nd quarter of 2008), limited to English-language studies.

Study selection: 3 reviewers selected longitudinal studies with 10 or more participants that reported an association between LDL subfractions and incidence or severity of cardiovascular disease and in which plasma samples were collected before outcome determination.

Data extraction: Data were extracted from 24 studies. The 10 studies that used analytical methods available for clinical use (all of which used nuclear magnetic resonance) had full data extraction, including quality assessment (good, fair, or poor). All studies were extracted by 1 researcher and verified by another.

Data synthesis: All 24 studies, and the subset of 10 nuclear magnetic resonance studies, were heterogeneous in terms of the specific tests analyzed, analytical methods used, participants investigated, and outcomes measured. Higher LDL particle number was consistently associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, independent of other lipid measurements. Other LDL subfractions were generally not associated with cardiovascular disease after adjustment for cholesterol concentrations. No study evaluated the incremental value of LDL subfractions beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors or their test performance.

Limitation: Publication bias was a possibility.

Conclusion: Higher LDL particle number has been associated with cardiovascular disease incidence, but studies have not determined whether any measures of LDL subfractions add incremental benefit to traditional risk factor assessment. Routine use of clinically available LDL subfraction tests to estimate cardiovascular disease risk is premature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Study flow diagram.
CVD cardiovascular disease; NMR nuclear magnetic resonance. * Description of methods used to measure low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions, comparison of different methods, variability of measures, link between therapies to alter LDL subfractions and CVD outcomes, and association between LDL subfractions and incident and prevalent CVD. † No clinical CVD outcome, not LDL subfractions, not an analysis of baseline lipoprotein subfractions, or no original data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97. [PMID: ] - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal RS, Michos ED, Nasir K. Further improvements in CHD risk prediction for women [Editorial]. JAMA. 2007;297:641–3. [PMID: ] - PubMed
    1. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N, Cook NR. Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds Risk Score. JAMA. 2007;297:611–9. [PMID: ] - PubMed
    1. Wang TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Levy D, Newton-Cheh C, et al. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2631–9. [PMID: ] - PubMed
    1. Ware JH. The limitations of risk factors as prognostic tools. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2615–7. [PMID: ] - PubMed

Substances