Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 May;19(3):309-14.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328329a303.

Management of localized prostate cancer in men over 65 years

Affiliations
Review

Management of localized prostate cancer in men over 65 years

Matthew R Cooperberg et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2009 May.

Abstract

Purpose of review: With the pervasive use of prostate-specific antigen-based screening, many men in the US are now diagnosed with prostate cancer in their 50s or earlier. However, the majority of tumors are still detected among men over 65-years-old. The appropriate management of localized disease among these older men is controversial.

Recent findings: The US Preventive Services Task Force recently strengthened its recommendation against screening men over 75 years old. To date, however, screening among older patients remains common, and does not adequately reflect patient life expectancy. Older men are more likely to be diagnosed with higher-risk tumors, but are less likely to receive curative local therapy, and are more likely to be managed with primary androgen deprivation therapy. Careful active surveillance is an increasingly viable option for selected older men with low-risk tumors; focal therapy and low-intensity medical therapy may be emerging alternatives in the near future.

Summary: Decisions regarding both screening and treatment should consider patient comorbidity, life expectancy, and treatment preferences rather than chronologic age. Treatment also must be tailored to the level of tumor risk. Increased use of active surveillance, together with diet and lifestyle intervention, is appropriate for many older men with lower-risk tumors. Conversely, those with high-risk disease should not be denied the opportunity for curative local therapy on the basis of age alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by