Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jun;24(6):702-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0982-0. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

Process of care failures in breast cancer diagnosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Process of care failures in breast cancer diagnosis

Saul N Weingart et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Process of care failures may contribute to diagnostic errors in breast cancer care.

Objective: To identify patient- and provider-related process of care failures in breast cancer screening and follow-up in a non-claims-based cohort.

Design: Retrospective chart review of a cohort of patients referred to two Boston cancer centers with new breast cancer diagnoses between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2004.

Participants: We identified 2,275 women who reported > or =90 days between symptom onset and breast cancer diagnosis or presentation with at least stage II disease. We then selected the 340 (14.9%) whose physicians shared an electronic medical record. We excluded 238 subjects whose records were insufficient for review, yielding a final cohort of 102 patients.

Interventions: None

Measurements: We tabulated the number and types of process of care failures and examined risk factors using bivariate analyses and multivariable Poisson regression.

Main results: Twenty-six of 102 patients experienced > or =1 process of care failure. The most common failures occurred when physicians failed to perform an adequate physical examination, when patients failed to seek care, and when diagnostic or laboratory tests were ordered but patients failed to complete them. Failures were attributed in similar numbers to provider- and patient-related factors (n = 30 vs. n = 25, respectively). Process of care failures were more likely when the patient's primary care physician was male (IRR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 6.5) and when the patient was non-white (IRR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.7).

Conclusions: Process failures were common in this patient cohort, with both clinicians and patients contributing to breakdowns in the diagnostic process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of cohort selection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. None
    2. Schaefer M. Overview of CRICO cancer-related diagnosis claims 1992–2001. RMF Forum. 2002;22:4–9.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17015866', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17015866/'}]}
    2. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488–96. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02143-1', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02143-1'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10209974', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10209974/'}]}
    2. Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999;353:1119–26. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1136/qshc.2003.008029', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.008029'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1743812', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1743812/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15069219', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15069219/'}]}
    2. Phillips RL Jr, Bartholomew LA, Dovey SM, Fryer GE Jr, Miyoshi TJ, Green LA. Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:121–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chandra A, Nundy S, Seabury SA. The growth of physician medical malpractice payments: evidence from the national practitioner data bank. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;Suppl Web Exclusives: W5-40–W5-49. - PubMed

Publication types