Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):493-502.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2998. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

Perceptions of standards-based electronic prescribing systems as implemented in outpatient primary care: a physician survey

Affiliations

Perceptions of standards-based electronic prescribing systems as implemented in outpatient primary care: a physician survey

C Jason Wang et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the experiences of e-prescribing users and nonusers regarding prescription safety and workload and to assess the use of information from two e-prescribing standards (for medication history and formulary and benefit information), as they are implemented. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey of physicians who either had installed or were awaiting installation of one of two commercial e-prescribing systems. MEASUREMENTS Perceptions about medication history and formulary and benefit information among all respondents, and among e-prescribing users, experiences with system usability, job performance impact, and amount of e-prescribing. RESULTS Of 395 eligible physicians, 228 (58%) completed the survey. E-prescribers (n = 139) were more likely than non-e-prescribers (n = 89) to perceive that they could identify clinically important drug-drug interactions (83 versus 67%, p = 0.004) but not that they could identify prescriptions from other providers (65 versus 60%, p = 0.49). They also perceived no significant difference in calls about drug coverage problems (76 versus 71% reported getting 10 or fewer such calls per week; p = 0.43). Most e-prescribers reported high satisfaction with their systems, but 17% had stopped using the system and another 46% said they sometimes reverted to handwriting for prescriptions that they could write electronically. The volume of e-prescribing was correlated with perceptions that it enhanced job performance, whereas quitting was associated with perceptions of poor usability. CONCLUSIONS E-prescribing users reported patient safety benefits but they did not perceive the enhanced benefits expected from using standardized medication history or formulary and benefit information. Additional work is needed for these standards to have the desired effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experiences of E-prescribers Familiar with Medication History Information (n = 51).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experiences of E-Prescribers Regarding the Formulary and Benefit Information in the E-prescribing system (n = 139).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jani YH, Ghaleb MA, Marks SD, et al. Electronic prescribing reduced prescribing errors in a pediatric renal outpatient clinic. [see comment] J Pediatr 2008;152:214-218. - PubMed
    1. Wolfstadt JI, Gurwitz JH, Field TS, et al. The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: A systematic review J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:451-458. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donyai P, O'Grady K, Jacklin A, Barber N, Franklin BD. The effects of electronic prescribing on the quality of prescribing Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008;65:230-237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eslami S, Abu-Hanna A, de Keizer NF. Evaluation of outpatient computerized physician medication order entry systems: A systematic review J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:400-406. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollingworth W, Devine EB, Hansen RN, et al. The impact of e-prescribing on prescriber and staff time in ambulatory care clinics: A time motion study J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:722-730. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types