Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):531-8.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2910. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

What evidence supports the use of computerized alerts and prompts to improve clinicians' prescribing behavior?

Angela Schedlbauer  1 , Vibhore Prasad, Caroline Mulvaney, Shobha Phansalkar, Wendy Stanton, David W Bates, Anthony J Avery
Affiliations
Review

What evidence supports the use of computerized alerts and prompts to improve clinicians' prescribing behavior?

Angela Schedlbauer et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Alerts and prompts represent promising types of decision support in electronic prescribing to tackle inadequacies in prescribing. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of computerized drug alerts and prompts searching EMBASE, CINHAL, MEDLINE, and PsychINFO up to May 2007. Studies assessing the impact of electronic alerts and prompts on clinicians' prescribing behavior were selected and categorized by decision support type. Most alerts and prompts (23 out of 27) demonstrated benefit in improving prescribing behavior and/or reducing error rates. The impact appeared to vary based on the type of decision support. Some of these alerts (n = 5) reported a positive impact on clinical and health service management outcomes. For many categories of reminders, the number of studies was very small and few data were available from the outpatient setting. None of the studies evaluated features that might make alerts and prompts more effective. Details of an updated search run in Jan 2009 are included in the supplement section of this review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Categories of drug alerts.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Categories of drug alerts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart detailing process of identification and selection of relevant papers.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Roughead EE, Gilbert AL, Primrose JG, Sansom LN. Drug-related hospital admissions: A review of Australian studies Med J Aust 1998;168(8):405-408. - PubMed
    1. Von Laue NC, Schwappach DLB, Koeck CM. The epidemiology of preventable adverse drug events: A review of the literature Wien Klin Wochenschr 2003;115(12):407-415. - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. J Am Med Assoc 1995;274:29-34. - PubMed
    1. Kuperman GJ, Bobb A, Payne TH, et al. Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: A review J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14(1):29-40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller RA, Waitman LR, Chen S, Rosenbloom ST. The anatomy of decision support during inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE): Empirical observations from a decade of CPOE experience at Vanderbilt J Biomed Inform 2005;38(6):469-485. - PMC - PubMed