Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):550-60.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2888. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology

Calvin K L Or  1 , Ben-Tzion Karsh
Affiliations
Review

A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology

Calvin K L Or et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

A systematic literature review was performed to identify variables promoting consumer health information technology (CHIT) acceptance among patients. The electronic bibliographic databases Web of Science, Business Source Elite, CINAHL, Communication and Mass Media Complete, MEDLINE, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo were searched. A cited reference search of articles meeting the inclusion criteria was also conducted to reduce misses. Fifty-two articles met the selection criteria. Among them, 94 different variables were tested for associations with acceptance. Most of those tested (71%) were patient factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, health- and treatment-related variables, and prior experience or exposure to computer/health technology. Only ten variables were related to human-technology interaction; 16 were organizational factors; and one was related to the environment. In total, 62 (66%) were found to predict acceptance in at least one study. Existing literature focused largely on patient-related factors. No studies examined the impact of social and task factors on acceptance, and few tested the effects of organizational or environmental factors on acceptance. Future research guided by technology acceptance theories should fill those gaps to improve our understanding of patient CHIT acceptance, which in turn could lead to better CHIT design and implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the selection process for including articles in review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Department of Health & Human Services. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (onc)-president's vision for health IThttp://www.hhs.gov/healthit/presvision.htmlAccessed December 2007.
    1. The White House National Economic Council, Reforming Health Care for the 21st Centuryhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/stateoftheunion/2006/healthcare/healthcare_booklet.pd... December 2007.
    1. Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, et al. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underservedIn: Lewis D, Jimison HB, Eysenbach G, Kukafka R, Stavri PZ, editors. Consumer Health Informatics: Informing Consumers and Improving Health Care. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2005. pp. 239-247.
    1. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health Wired for health and Well-Being: The emergence of interactive health communicationIn: Eng TR, Gustafson DH, editors. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Government Printing Office; 1999.
    1. Slack W. CybermedicineSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997.