A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques

J Endod. 1991 Jun;17(6):275-9. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81866-2.

Abstract

Sixty extracted human teeth were divided into three groups of 20 each. Apically extruded debris and irrigant were collected, dried, and weighed by the following three instrumentation techniques: (a) group 1, filing 1 mm short of the foramen; (b) group 2, Canal Master instrumentation to the foramen; and (c) group 3, filing to the foramen (for a relative comparison). The results indicated that all three groups were significantly different from one another. Group 1 had the least amount of debris extruded. Of the two groups instrumented to the foramen, group 3 had twice as much debris extruded as group 2. An apical dentinal plug was frequently found in group 1 and was probably a major reason why this group had the least amount of extruded debris. The significance of this dentinal plug and possible indications for instrumentation to the foramen are discussed.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Dental Cavity Preparation / instrumentation
  • Dental Cavity Preparation / methods*
  • Dental Leakage*
  • Humans
  • Root Canal Therapy / instrumentation
  • Root Canal Therapy / methods*