Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 19414526
- DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp017
Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Various studies have reported an inverse relation between oral contraceptive (OC) use and the risk of colorectal cancer, but the issue is still open.
Methods: In order to quantify the association between OC use and colorectal cancer risk, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on this issue. We identified all relevant studies published, in English, as original articles up to December 2008 through a search of the literature using PubMed and EMBASE, and by reviewing the references from the retrieved articles.
Results: The summary relative risk of colorectal cancer for ever versus never OC use was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.69-0.97) from 11 case-control studies, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75-0.89) from seven cohort studies, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.92) from all studies combined. The results were similar for colon and rectal cancer. No difference was evident according to duration of OC use both for colon and rectal cancer, although there is an indication that the protection is stronger for more recent use (OR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.53-0.90, on the basis of four studies).
Conclusion: Epidemiological data consistently indicate that OC users have a reduced risk of colorectal cancer, and that the protection is greater for recent use in the absence, however, of a duration-risk relation.
Similar articles
-
Oral contraceptive use and risk of colorectal cancer.Epidemiology. 1998 May;9(3):295-300. Epidemiology. 1998. PMID: 9583422
-
Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis.Br J Cancer. 2001 Mar 2;84(5):722-7. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1622. Br J Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11237397 Free PMC article.
-
Nonlinear reduction in risk for colorectal cancer by oral contraceptive use: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Jan;26(1):65-78. doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0483-2. Epub 2014 Oct 31. Cancer Causes Control. 2015. PMID: 25359305
-
Linear reduction in thyroid cancer risk by oral contraceptive use: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2234-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev160. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26141711 Review.
-
Fish consumption and colorectal cancer risk in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Med. 2012 Jun;125(6):551-9.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.01.022. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Am J Med. 2012. PMID: 22513196 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in T2 colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul;29(7):921-931. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02547-7. Epub 2024 May 6. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38709424
-
DNA Damage Responses in Tumors Are Not Proliferative Stimuli, but Rather They Are DNA Repair Actions Requiring Supportive Medical Care.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 19;16(8):1573. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081573. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38672654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association between oral contraceptives with lipid profile: results from Hoveyzeh cohort study (HCS).BMC Womens Health. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02703-7. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37875906 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer surveillance for transgender and gender diverse patients with Lynch syndrome: a practice resource of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer.Fam Cancer. 2023 Oct;22(4):437-448. doi: 10.1007/s10689-023-00341-4. Epub 2023 Jun 21. Fam Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37341816 Review.
-
Reproductive Factors in Relation to Incidence of Lung and Colorectal Cancers in a Cohort of Norwegian Women: The HUNT Study.J Endocr Soc. 2022 Nov 12;7(1):bvac175. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvac175. eCollection 2022 Nov 17. J Endocr Soc. 2022. PMID: 36466004 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
