Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 459 (7243), 85-8

Insular Dwarfism in Hippos and a Model for Brain Size Reduction in Homo Floresiensis

Affiliations

Insular Dwarfism in Hippos and a Model for Brain Size Reduction in Homo Floresiensis

Eleanor M Weston et al. Nature.

Abstract

Body size reduction in mammals is usually associated with only moderate brain size reduction, because the brain and sensory organs complete their growth before the rest of the body during ontogeny. On this basis, 'phyletic dwarfs' are predicted to have a greater relative brain size than 'phyletic giants'. However, this trend has been questioned in the special case of dwarfism of mammals on islands. Here we show that the endocranial capacities of extinct dwarf species of hippopotamus from Madagascar are up to 30% smaller than those of a mainland African ancestor scaled to equivalent body mass. These results show that brain size reduction is much greater than predicted from an intraspecific 'late ontogenetic' model of dwarfism in which brain size scales to body size with an exponent of 0.35. The nature of the proportional change or grade shift observed here indicates that selective pressures on brain size are potentially independent of those on body size. This study demonstrates empirically that it is mechanistically possible for dwarf mammals on islands to evolve significantly smaller brains than would be predicted from a model of dwarfing based on the intraspecific scaling of the mainland ancestor. Our findings challenge current understanding of brain-body allometric relationships in mammals and suggest that the process of dwarfism could in principle explain small brain size, a factor relevant to the interpretation of the small-brained hominin found on the Island of Flores, Indonesia.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The relationship between brain size and cranial size for an intraspecific ‘late ontogenetic’ model of dwarfing
Major axis slopes and 95% confidence intervals: H. amphibius 0.3482 (0.28 - 0.41) thin line, H. lemerlei 0.369 (0.15 - 0.63) bold line, H. madagascariensis 0.4587 (0.20 - 0.79) dashed line. H. amphibius (filled diamonds; n = 33), H. lemerlei (filled triangles; n = 12), H. madagascariensis (open triangles; n = 12), C. liberiensis (crosses; n = 6). For statistical comparisons see Supplementary Table 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The relationship between brain size and cranial size for an intraspecific ‘ontogenetic’ model of dwarfing
Major axis slopes and 95% confidence intervals: H. amphibius 0.468 (0.44 - 0.50) thin line, dwarf species pooled 0.454 (0.27 - 0.67) bold line. H. amphibius (filled diamonds; n = 37), H. lemerlei (filled triangles; n= 12), H. madagascariensis (open triangles; n = 12), C. liberiensis (crosses; n = 6). For statistical comparisons see Supplementary Table 1.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 21 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Shea BT. Phyletic size change and brian/body allometry: a consideration based on the African pongids and other primates. Int. J. Primatol. 1983;4:33–62.
    1. Martin RD. Human brain evolution in an ecological context: 52nd James Arthur Lecture on the evolution of the human brain. American Museum of Natural History; New York: 1983.
    1. Gould SJ. Allometry in primates with emphasis on scaling and the evolution of the brain. Contrib. Primatol. 1975;5:244–292. - PubMed
    1. Köhler M, Moyà-Solà S. Reduction of brain and sense organs in the fossil insular bovid Myotragus. Brain. Behav. Evol. 2004;63:125–140. - PubMed
    1. Martin RD, Harvey PH. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. Jungers WL, editor. Plenum Press; New York: 1985. pp. 147–173.

Publication types

Feedback