Intimate partner violence and functional health status: associations with severity, danger, and self-advocacy behaviors
- PMID: 19445614
- PMCID: PMC2872257
- DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0521
Intimate partner violence and functional health status: associations with severity, danger, and self-advocacy behaviors
Erratum in
- J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jun;18(6):917
Abstract
Objective: To assess physical and mental functional health status as associated with the severity of intimate partner violence (IPV) and perceived danger.
Methods: Prospective cross-sectional survey of all patients aged 18-55 in an urban emergency department during a convenience sample of shifts. Instruments included the George Washington Universal Violence Prevention Screening protocol, administered by computer during the initial visit, the Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12), the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2), and the Revised Danger Assessment (DA), administered by interview at 1 week follow-up.
Results: In total, 548 (20%) participants screened disclosed IPV victimization. Of those, 216 (40%) completed the follow-up assessment 1 week later. This cohort was 91% African American, 70% single, and 63% female, with a mean age of 35 (SD 10.41). Both physical and mental health functioning scores were lower than normative levels (50) compared with national averages: Physical Component Summary (PCS) scale 43.64 (SD 10.86) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scale 37.46 (SD 12.29). As physical assault, psychological aggression, and reported injury increased on the CTS2, mental health functioning diminished (p < 0.01). Increased physical assault and psychological aggression were also associated with diminished physical health functioning (p < 0.05). As victim-perceived danger increased on the DA, both physical and mental health functioning decreased (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively). Greater self-advocacy activities were associated with lower mental (but not physical) health functioning as well. Females experienced worsening mental health functioning as both physical assault and psychological aggression increased, whereas male victims experienced worsening mental health functioning only as psychological aggression increased.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that IPV takes a greater mental than physical toll (for both sexes) and that as IPV severity increases, mental health functioning diminishes and self-advocacy behaviors increase. Additionally, as perceived danger increases, both physical and mental health status worsens. This has important implications for clinicians to assess and consider IPV victims' perceptions of their situations relative to danger, not just the levels of abuse they are experiencing.
Similar articles
-
Intimate Partner Violence Victimization and Associated Implications for Health and Functioning Among Male and Female Post-9/11 Veterans.Med Care. 2017 Sep;55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2:S78-S84. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000741. Med Care. 2017. PMID: 28806369
-
Female victimization and intimate partner violence after the May 12, 2008, Sichuan earthquake.Violence Vict. 2011;26(3):364-76. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.26.3.364. Violence Vict. 2011. PMID: 21846023
-
Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study.Qual Life Res. 2015 Feb;24(2):463-71. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9. Epub 2014 Jul 26. Qual Life Res. 2015. PMID: 25063083
-
Prevention of partner violence by focusing on behaviors of both young males and females.Prev Sci. 2012 Aug;13(4):329-39. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0237-2. Prev Sci. 2012. PMID: 21779924 Review.
-
Health disparities and violence against women: why and how cultural and societal influences matter.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007 Apr;8(2):90-104. doi: 10.1177/1524838007301160. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007. PMID: 17545567 Review.
Cited by
-
Differential Indirect Effects of Military Sexual Trauma on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters via Past-Year Intimate Partner Violence Experiences.Traumatology (Tallahass Fla). 2024 Mar;30(1):17-26. doi: 10.1037/trm0000242. Epub 2020 Feb 27. Traumatology (Tallahass Fla). 2024. PMID: 38818344
-
Association Between Men's Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence and Self-reported Health Outcomes in New Zealand.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2252578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52578. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 36696112 Free PMC article.
-
Linguistic Analysis of Online Domestic Violence Testimonies in the Context of COVID-19.Sage Open. 2023 Jan 10;13(1):21582440221146135. doi: 10.1177/21582440221146135. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar. Sage Open. 2023. PMID: 36650826 Free PMC article.
-
Design and Evaluation of a Curriculum on Intimate Partner Violence for Medical Students in an Emergency Medicine Clerkship.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Oct 13;13:1279-1285. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S365450. eCollection 2022. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022. PMID: 36262384 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the effects of physical violence and serious injury on health-related quality of life: Evidence from 19 waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey.Qual Life Res. 2022 Nov;31(11):3153-3164. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03190-3. Epub 2022 Aug 8. Qual Life Res. 2022. PMID: 35939253 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alpert EJ. Violence in intimate relationships and the practicing internist: New “disease” or new agenda? Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:774–781. - PubMed
-
- Plichta SB. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences: Policy and practice implications. J Interpers Violence. 2004;19:1296–1323. - PubMed
-
- Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002;359:1331–1336. - PubMed
-
- McFarlane JM. Groff JY. O'Brien JA. Watson K. Prevalence of partner violence against 7,443 African American, white, and Hispanic women receiving care at urban public primary care clinics. Public Health Nurs. 2005;22:98–107. - PubMed
-
- West CM. Black women and intimate partner violence: New directions for research. J Interpers Violence. 2004;19:1487–1493. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
