Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
, 13 (12), 2321-9

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Programs for Patients Having Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Programs for Patients Having Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Cagla Eskicioglu et al. J Gastrointest Surg.

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery programs have been introduced with aims of improving patient care, reducing complication rates, and shortening hospital stay following colorectal surgery. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether enhanced recovery after surgery programs, when compared to traditional perioperative care, are associated with reduced primary hospital length of stay in adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and the reference lists were searched for relevant articles. Only randomized controlled trials comparing an enhanced recovery program with traditional postoperative care were included.

Results: Three of four included studies showed significantly shorter primary lengths of stay for patients enrolled in enhanced recovery programs. There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality when the two groups were compared [relative risk (RR) = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.12-2.38; test for heterogeneity, p = 0.40 and I (2) = 0], and patients in enhanced recovery programs were less likely to develop postoperative complications (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42-0.88; test for heterogeneity, p = 0.95 and I (2) = 0).

Authors' conclusions: There is some evidence to suggest that enhanced recovery after surgery programs are better than traditional perioperative care, but evidence from a larger, better quality randomized controlled trial is necessary.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 61 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Br J Surg. 2006 Mar;93(3):300-8 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004929 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Mar;47(3):271-7; discussion 277-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Apr;20(3 Suppl):21-35 - PubMed
    1. Clin Nutr. 2005 Jun;24(3):466-77 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback