Prescription errors and outcomes related to inconsistent information transmitted through computerized order entry: a prospective study
- PMID: 19468092
- PMCID: PMC2919338
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.102
Prescription errors and outcomes related to inconsistent information transmitted through computerized order entry: a prospective study
Abstract
Background: Although several types of computerized provider order entry (CPOE)-related errors may occur, errors related to inconsistent information within the same prescription (ie, mismatch between the structured template and the associated free-text field) have not been described, to our knowledge. We determined the nature and frequency of such errors and identified their potential predictive variables.
Methods: In this prospective study, we enrolled pharmacists to report prescriptions containing inconsistent communication over a 4-month period at a tertiary care facility. We also electronically retrieved all prescriptions written during the study period containing any comments in the free-text field and then randomly selected 500 for manual review to determine inconsistencies between free-text and structured fields. Of these, prescriptions without inconsistencies were categorized as controls. Data on potentially predictive variables from reported and unreported errors and controls were collected. For all inconsistencies, we determined their nature (eg, drug dosage or administration schedule) and potential harm and used multivariate logistic regression models to identify factors associated with errors and harm.
Results: Of 55 992 new prescriptions, 532 (0.95%) were reported to contain inconsistent communication, a rate comparable to that obtained from the unreported group. Drug dosage was the most common inconsistent element among both groups. Certain medications were more likely associated with errors, as was the inpatient setting (odds ratio, 3.30; 95% confidence interval, 2.18-5.00) and surgical subspecialty (odds ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.82). About 20% of errors could have resulted in moderate to severe harm, for which significant independent predictors were found.
Conclusions: Despite standardization of data entry, inconsistent communication in CPOE poses a significant risk to safety. Improving the usability of the CPOE interface and integrating it with workflow may reduce this risk.
Figures
Comment in
-
Health care information technology: a cloud around the silver lining?Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):924-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.79. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19468082 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The effect of computerized physician-order entry on outpatient prescription errors.Manag Care Interface. 2007 Mar;20(3):53-7. Manag Care Interface. 2007. PMID: 17458483
-
Medication errors: a prospective cohort study of hand-written and computerised physician order entry in the intensive care unit.Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):R516-21. doi: 10.1186/cc3793. Epub 2005 Aug 8. Crit Care. 2005. PMID: 16277713 Free PMC article.
-
Reduction in chemotherapy order errors with computerized physician order entry.J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jan;10(1):e5-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000903. Epub 2013 Sep 3. J Oncol Pract. 2014. PMID: 24003174
-
Prevalence of computerized physician order entry systems-related medication prescription errors: A systematic review.Int J Med Inform. 2018 Mar;111:112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 28. Int J Med Inform. 2018. PMID: 29425622 Review.
-
[Opportunities for medication errors and pharmacist's interventions in the context of computerized prescription order entry: a review of data published by French hospital pharmacists].Ann Pharm Fr. 2012 Mar;70(2):62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 20. Ann Pharm Fr. 2012. PMID: 22500957 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Electronic Medication Management Systems: Analysis of Enhancements to Reduce Errors and Improve Workflow.Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Oct;12(5):1049-1060. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739196. Epub 2021 Nov 10. Appl Clin Inform. 2021. PMID: 34758493 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Diagnostic Recommendations from Individual Physicians versus the Collective Intelligence of Multiple Physicians in Ambulatory Cases Referred for Specialist Consultation.Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):293-302. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211031209. Epub 2021 Aug 11. Med Decis Making. 2022. PMID: 34378444 Free PMC article.
-
The use of narrative electronic prescribing instructions in pharmacoepidemiology: A scoping review for the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):1281-1292. doi: 10.1002/pds.5331. Epub 2021 Jul 28. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021. PMID: 34278660 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinician Perceptions on the Use of Free-Text Communication Orders.Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May;12(3):484-494. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731002. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Appl Clin Inform. 2021. PMID: 34077971 Free PMC article.
-
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06772-y. Epub 2021 Apr 27. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 33907982 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bates DW, Kuperman G, Teich JM. Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care. 1994;2(4):18–27. - PubMed
-
- Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998 October 21;280(15):1311–6. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 1999. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
