The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record
- PMID: 19482968
- DOI: 10.1177/1062860609336627
The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record
Abstract
The electronic health record (EHR) is seen by many as an ideal vehicle for measuring quality of health care and monitoring ongoing provider performance. It is anticipated that the availability of EHR-extracted data will allow quality assessment without the expensive and time-consuming process of medical record abstraction. A review of the data requirements for the indicators in the Quality Assessment Tools system suggests that only about a third of the indicators would be readily accessible from EHR data. Other factors involving complexity of required data elements, provider documentation habits, and EHR variability make the task of quality measurement more difficult than may be appreciated. Accurately identifying eligible cases for quality assessment and validly scoring those cases with EHR-extracted data will pose significant challenges but could potentially plummet the cost and therefore expand the use of quality assessment.
Similar articles
-
Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey.Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):203-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c16203. Med Care. 2010. PMID: 20125047
-
Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record.Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2272-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2272. Arch Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17101947
-
Development of electronic medical record content standards to collect pan-Canadian Primary Health Care indicator data.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;143:167-73. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009. PMID: 19380932
-
Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature.Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Oct;67(5):503-27. doi: 10.1177/1077558709359007. Epub 2010 Feb 11. Med Care Res Rev. 2010. PMID: 20150441 Review.
-
Using computerized medical databases to measure and to improve the quality of intensive care.J Crit Care. 2004 Dec;19(4):248-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.08.004. J Crit Care. 2004. PMID: 15648042 Review.
Cited by
-
Developing a questionnaire to evaluate an automated audit & feedback intervention: a Rand-modified Delphi method.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 5;24(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10915-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38581009 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing American Academy of Neurology Quality Measures in Antigua Using Quality Improvement Methodology.Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Feb;14(1):e200231. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200231. Epub 2023 Dec 22. Neurol Clin Pract. 2024. PMID: 38152065
-
Improving Seizure Frequency Documentation and Classification.Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Dec;13(6):e200212. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200212. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Neurol Clin Pract. 2023. PMID: 37873534
-
The Value of New Fields in the Medical Record for Quality Improvement.Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Apr 28;4(2):65-69. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-37. eCollection 2021 May. Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021. PMID: 37260786 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and Outcomes of Non-Ventilator-Associated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia in 284 US Hospitals Using Electronic Surveillance Criteria.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314185. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14185. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37200031 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
