Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 35 (6), 348-53

Science Journal Editors' Views on Publication Ethics: Results of an International Survey

Affiliations

Science Journal Editors' Views on Publication Ethics: Results of an International Survey

E Wager et al. J Med Ethics.

Abstract

Background: Breaches of publication ethics such as plagiarism, data fabrication and redundant publication are recognised as forms of research misconduct that can undermine the scientific literature. We surveyed journal editors to determine their views about a range of publication ethics issues.

Methods: Questionnaire sent to 524 editors-in-chief of Wiley-Blackwell science journals asking about the severity and frequency of 16 ethical issues at their journals, their confidence in handling such issues, and their awareness and use of guidelines.

Results: Responses were obtained from 231 editors (44%), of whom 48% edited healthcare journals. The general level of concern about the 16 issues was low, with mean severity scores of <1 (on a scale of 0-3) for all but one. The issue of greatest concern (mean score 1.19) was redundant publication. Most editors felt confident in handling the issues, with <15% feeling "not at all confident" for all but one of the issues (gift authorship, 22% not confident). Most editors believed such problems occurred less than once a year and >20% of the editors stated that 12 of the 16 items never occurred at their journal. However, 13%-47% did not know the frequency of the problems. Awareness and use of guidelines was generally low. Most editors were unaware of all except other journals' instructions.

Conclusions: Most editors of science journals seem not very concerned about publication ethics and believe that misconduct occurs only rarely in their journals. Many editors are unfamiliar with available guidelines but would welcome more guidance or training.

Similar articles

  • Views of Iranian Medical Journal Editors on Medical Research Publication
    A Etemadi et al. Saudi Med J 25 (1 Suppl), S29-33. PMID 14968189.
    The results show that peer review is favored by all the editors studied, though it seems that journals do not follow clear-cut policies in this regard. Most of the editor …
  • Ethical Issues Faced by Nursing Editors
    MC Freda et al. West J Nurs Res 27 (4), 487-99. PMID 15870245.
    This study reports on ethical issues faced by editors of nursing journals, a topic which has not appeared in the nursing literature. A survey of nursing editors (n = 88)w …
  • Advertising in Dermatology Journals: Journals' and Journal Editors' Policies, Practices, and Attitudes
    CL Bartus et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 55 (1), 116-22. PMID 16781302.
    Policies, practices, and attitudes toward advertising vary among dermatology journals and dermatology journal editors. Journals, especially those without a policy, should …
  • [Ethics in Articles Published in Medical Journals]
    H Reyes et al. Rev Med Chil 135 (4), 529-33. PMID 17554464. - Review
    Authors of clinical articles have similar motivations and rules than authors in other scientific fields. In addition, medical research must obey specific ethical rules th …
  • Ethics and Scientific Publication
    DJ Benos et al. Adv Physiol Educ 29 (2), 59-74. PMID 15905149. - Review
    This article summarizes the major categories of ethical violations encountered during submission, review, and publication of scientific articles. We discuss data fabricat …
See all similar articles

Cited by 28 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback