Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts
- PMID: 19487505
- PMCID: PMC2686131
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00913
Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts
Abstract
Background: The management of degenerative spondylolisthesis associated with spinal stenosis remains controversial. Surgery is widely used and has recently been shown to be more effective than nonoperative treatment when the results were followed over two years. Questions remain regarding the long-term effects of surgical treatment compared with those of nonoperative treatment.
Methods: Surgical candidates from thirteen centers with symptoms of at least twelve weeks' duration as well as confirmatory imaging showing degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis were offered enrollment in a randomized cohort or observational cohort. Treatment consisted of standard decompressive laminectomy (with or without fusion) or usual nonoperative care. Primary outcome measures were the Short Form-36 (SF-36) bodily pain and physical function scores and the modified Oswestry Disability Index at six weeks, three months, six months, and yearly up to four years.
Results: In the randomized cohort (304 patients enrolled), 66% of those randomized to receive surgery received it by four years whereas 54% of those randomized to receive nonoperative care received surgery by four years. In the observational cohort (303 patients enrolled), 97% of those who chose surgery received it whereas 33% of those who chose nonoperative care eventually received surgery. The intent-to-treat analysis of the randomized cohort, which was limited by nonadherence to the assigned treatment, showed no significant differences in treatment outcomes between the operative and nonoperative groups at three or four years. An as-treated analysis combining the randomized and observational cohorts that adjusted for potential confounders demonstrated that the clinically relevant advantages of surgery that had been previously reported through two years were maintained at four years, with treatment effects of 15.3 (95% confidence interval, 11 to 19.7) for bodily pain, 18.9 (95% confidence interval, 14.8 to 23) for physical function, and -14.3 (95% confidence interval, -17.5 to -11.1) for the Oswestry Disability Index. Early advantages (at two years) of surgical treatment in terms of the secondary measures of bothersomeness of back and leg symptoms, overall satisfaction with current symptoms, and self-rated progress were also maintained at four years.
Conclusions: Compared with patients who are treated nonoperatively, patients in whom degenerative spondylolisthesis and associated spinal stenosis are treated surgically maintain substantially greater pain relief and improvement in function for four years.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes?: a subanalysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 15;35(4):439-46. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdafb9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20081560 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 15;35(14):1329-38. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20453723 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2257-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070302. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17538085 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review.JAMA. 2022 May 3;327(17):1688-1699. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5921. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35503342 Review.
-
Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosurgery. 2017 May 1;80(5):701-715. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw162. Neurosurgery. 2017. PMID: 28327997 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion Patients Stratified by the Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) Classification System.Cureus. 2024 Feb 14;16(2):e54177. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54177. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38496088 Free PMC article.
-
Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Endoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Comparison with Conservative Treatment.Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023 Oct 13;8(1):73-82. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0093. eCollection 2024 Jan 27. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 38343406 Free PMC article.
-
A New Interlaminar/Interspinous and Facet-Joint Stabilization System in Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease: 2 Years of Results.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023;135:439-445. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_67. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023. PMID: 38153506
-
Sagittal alignment in operative degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a scoping review.J Spine Surg. 2023 Sep 22;9(3):314-322. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-26. Epub 2023 Aug 11. J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 37841791 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preoperative conservative treatment is insufficiently described in clinical trials of lumbar fusion: a scoping review.Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):264-273. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07926-8. Epub 2023 Oct 6. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 37803158 Review.
References
-
- Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB, Chapin AM, Patrick DL, Long JM, Singer DE. The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:1787-95. - PubMed
-
- Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine. 2000;25:556-62. - PubMed
-
- Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimäki T, Rönty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Härkänen T, Hurri H; Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research Group. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32:1-8. - PubMed
-
- Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6:461-72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
