Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate
- PMID: 19498057
- PMCID: PMC2731809
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1776OC
Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate
Abstract
Rationale: Although there is a growing belief that physicians should routinely provide a recommendation to surrogates during deliberations about withdrawing life support, there is a paucity of empirical data on surrogates' perspectives on this topic.
Objectives: To understand the attitudes of surrogate decision-makers toward receiving a physician's recommendation during deliberations about whether to limit life support for an incapacitated patient.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, mixed methods study among 169 surrogate decision-makers for critically ill patients. Surrogates sequentially viewed two videos of simulated physician-surrogate discussions about whether to limit life support, which varied only by whether the physician gave a recommendation.
Measurements and main results: The main quantitative outcome was whether surrogates preferred to receive a physicians' recommendation. Surrogates also participated in an in-depth, semistructured interview to explore the reasons for their preference. Fifty-six percent (95/169) of surrogates preferred to receive a recommendation, 42% (70/169) preferred not to receive a recommendation, and 2% (4/169) felt that both approaches were equally acceptable. We identified four main themes that explained surrogates' preferences, including surrogates' perceptions of physicians' appropriate role in life or death decisions and their perceptions of the positive or negative consequences of a recommendation on the physician-surrogate relationship, on the decision-making process, and on long-term regret for the family.
Conclusions: There is no consensus among surrogates about whether physicians should routinely provide a recommendation regarding life support decisions for incapacitated patients. These findings suggest that physicians should ask surrogates whether they wish to receive a recommendation regarding life support decisions and should be flexible in their approach to decision-making.
Figures
Comment in
-
Distinguishing messenger from message in delivering bad news.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):873; author reply 873-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.181.8.873a. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20382802 No abstract available.
-
Are physicians' recommendations on limiting life support really burdensome?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):873; author reply 873-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.181.8.873. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20382803 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Expanding the paradigm of the physician's role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically derived framework.Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):743-50. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c58842. Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20029347 Free PMC article.
-
Are physicians' recommendations on limiting life support really burdensome?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):873; author reply 873-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.181.8.873. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20382803 No abstract available.
-
Distinguishing messenger from message in delivering bad news.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):873; author reply 873-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.181.8.873a. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20382802 No abstract available.
-
Recommendations to Surrogates at the End of Life: A Critical Narrative Review of the Empirical Literature and a Normative Analysis.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Nov;50(5):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 27. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015. PMID: 26025276 Review.
-
Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?Crit Care Med. 1996 May;24(5):883-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199605000-00026. Crit Care Med. 1996. PMID: 8706470 Review.
Cited by
-
"Death as the One Great Certainty": ethical implications of children with irreversible cardiorespiratory failure and dependence on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 11;11:1325207. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1325207. eCollection 2023. Front Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38274466 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendation-making in the emergency department: A qualitative study of how Canadian emergency physicians guide treatment decisions about resuscitation in critically ill patients.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 May 23;4(3):e12962. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12962. eCollection 2023 Jun. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023. PMID: 37229184 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Providing Recommendations During Goals-of-Care Conversations: A Multisite Survey.J Palliat Med. 2023 Jul;26(7):951-959. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0394. Epub 2023 Mar 21. J Palliat Med. 2023. PMID: 36944150 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of a Mortality Prediction Model for Patients Receiving 14 Days of Mechanical Ventilation.Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2339-45. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001205. Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 26247337 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcomes after in-hospital CPR in older adults with chronic illness.Chest. 2014 Nov;146(5):1214-1225. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2110. Chest. 2014. PMID: 25086252 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Garland MJ, Nelson CA. Decisions about life-sustaining treatment: impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:633–638. - PubMed
-
- Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Nelson CA, Fields J. Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients. Nurs Res 2001;50:105–115. - PubMed
-
- Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1163–1167. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
