An alternative echocardiographic method to estimate mean pulmonary artery pressure: diagnostic and clinical implications

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Jul;22(7):814-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 7.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluated an alternative echocardiographic method to calculate mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP).

Methods: One hundred two patients were studied with simultaneous right-heart catheterization (RHC) and echocardiography. MPAP was calculated by adding the right ventricular-right atrial mean systolic gradient to right atrial pressure.

Results: The mean difference between MPAP calculated using this method and RHC-derived MPAP was -1.6 mm Hg, less than that of traditional systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP; -6.4 mm Hg) and MPAP estimated using the pulmonary regurgitation method (-13.9 mm Hg). The median absolute percentage difference of the MPAP calculations relative to RHC was significantly less with this method than with the pulmonary regurgitation method (18% vs 71%; P < .001) and similar to the SPAP method (both 18%; P = .30).

Conclusion: MPAP calculated using the proposed method is as accurate as SPAP calculation and less variable than previous methods, thus allowing widespread clinical use.

MeSH terms

  • Blood Pressure Determination / methods*
  • Blood Pressure*
  • Catheterization, Swan-Ganz
  • Echocardiography / methods*
  • Female
  • Heart Ventricles / diagnostic imaging
  • Heart Ventricles / physiopathology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pulmonary Artery / diagnostic imaging*
  • Pulmonary Artery / physiopathology*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity