Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence--a study of structural response in protein cores
- PMID: 19507241
- DOI: 10.1002/prot.22458
Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence--a study of structural response in protein cores
Abstract
Protein structures change during evolution in response to mutations. Here, we analyze the mapping between sequence and structure in a set of structurally aligned protein domains. To avoid artifacts, we restricted our attention only to the core components of these structures. We found that on average, using different measures of structural change, protein cores evolve linearly with evolutionary distance (amino acid substitutions per site). This is true irrespective of which measure of structural change we used, whether RMSD or discrete structural descriptors for secondary structure, accessibility, or contacts. This linear response allows us to quantify the claim that structure is more conserved than sequence. Using structural alphabets of similar cardinality to the sequence alphabet, structural cores evolve three to ten times slower than sequences. Although we observed an average linear response, we found a wide variance. Different domain families varied fivefold in structural response to evolution. An attempt to categorically analyze this variance among subgroups by structural and functional category revealed only one statistically significant trend. This trend can be explained by the fact that beta-sheets change faster than alpha-helices, most likely due to that they are shorter and that change occurs at the ends of the secondary structure elements.
2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.J Mol Biol. 2000 Aug 18;301(3):691-711. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3975. J Mol Biol. 2000. PMID: 10966778
-
Effective connectivity profile: a structural representation that evidences the relationship between protein structures and sequences.Proteins. 2008 Dec;73(4):872-88. doi: 10.1002/prot.22113. Proteins. 2008. PMID: 18536008
-
Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database.J Mol Biol. 2006 Jul 14;360(3):725-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.035. Epub 2006 Jun 2. J Mol Biol. 2006. PMID: 16780872
-
Fold change in evolution of protein structures.J Struct Biol. 2001 May-Jun;134(2-3):167-85. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4335. J Struct Biol. 2001. PMID: 11551177 Review.
-
[Structural bioinformatics].Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 2009 Sep;54(12 Suppl):1535-41. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 2009. PMID: 21089585 Review. Japanese. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Use of structural phylogenetic networks for classification of the ferritin-like superfamily.J Biol Chem. 2012 Jun 8;287(24):20565-75. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.367458. Epub 2012 Apr 25. J Biol Chem. 2012. PMID: 22535960 Free PMC article.
-
Network analysis of synonymous codon usage.Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec 8;36(19):4876-4884. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa603. Bioinformatics. 2020. PMID: 32609328 Free PMC article.
-
Metagenomic discovery of lipases with predicted structural similarity to Candida antarctica lipase B.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 6;18(12):e0295397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295397. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38055755 Free PMC article.
-
Structural screens identify candidate human homologs of insect chemoreceptors and cryptic Drosophila gustatory receptor-like proteins.Elife. 2023 Feb 20;12:e85537. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85537. Elife. 2023. PMID: 36803935 Free PMC article.
-
Why do eukaryotic proteins contain more intrinsically disordered regions?PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jul 22;15(7):e1007186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007186. eCollection 2019 Jul. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019. PMID: 31329574 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
