Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Aug;52(8):1479-95.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1395-7. Epub 2009 Jun 13.

Effect of Non-Oil-Seed Pulses on Glycaemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Experimental Trials in People With and Without Diabetes

Affiliations
Review

Effect of Non-Oil-Seed Pulses on Glycaemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Experimental Trials in People With and Without Diabetes

J L Sievenpiper et al. Diabetologia. .

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Dietary non-oil-seed pulses (chickpeas, beans, peas, lentils, etc.) are a good source of slowly digestible carbohydrate, fibre and vegetable protein and a valuable means of lowering the glycaemic-index (GI) of the diet. To assess the evidence that dietary pulses may benefit glycaemic control, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled experimental trials investigating the effect of pulses, alone or as part of low-GI or high-fibre diets, on markers of glycaemic control in people with and without diabetes.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library for relevant controlled trials of >or=7 days. Two independent reviewers (A. Esfahani and J. M. W. Wong) extracted information on study design, participants, treatments and outcomes. Data were pooled using the generic inverse variance method and expressed as standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed by chi (2) and quantified by I (2). Meta-regression models identified independent predictors of effects.

Results: A total of 41 trials (39 reports) were included. Pulses alone (11 trials) lowered fasting blood glucose (FBG) (-0.82, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.27) and insulin (-0.49, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.04). Pulses in low-GI diets (19 trials) lowered glycosylated blood proteins (GP), measured as HbA(1c) or fructosamine (-0.28, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.14). Finally, pulses in high-fibre diets (11 trials) lowered FBG (-0.32, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.15) and GP (-0.27, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.09). Inter-study heterogeneity was high and unexplained for most outcomes, with benefits modified or predicted by diabetes status, pulse type, dose, physical form, duration of follow-up, study quality, macronutrient profile of background diets, feeding control and design.

Conclusions/interpretation: Pooled analyses demonstrated that pulses, alone or in low-GI or high-fibre diets, improve markers of longer term glycaemic control in humans, with the extent of the improvements subject to significant inter-study heterogeneity. There is a need for further large, well-designed trials.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 45 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. J Am Coll Nutr. 1996 Dec;15(6):592-601 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2002 May;25(5):822-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2002 Jun 15;359(9323):2072-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Jun;35(6):1339-46 - PubMed
    1. Br J Nutr. 2004 Nov;92(5):785-90 - PubMed
Feedback