Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer
- PMID: 19531785
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.832
Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer
Abstract
Context: Computed tomographic (CT) colonography has been recognized as an alternative for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk individuals, but less information is available on its performance in individuals at increased risk of CRC.
Objective: To assess the accuracy of CT colonography in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals at increased risk of CRC using unblinded colonoscopy as the reference standard.
Design, setting, and participants: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Individuals at increased risk of CRC due to either family history of advanced neoplasia in first-degree relatives, personal history of colorectal adenomas, or positive results from fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) were recruited in 11 Italian centers and 1 Belgian center between December 2004 and May 2007. Each participant underwent CT colonography followed by colonoscopy on the same day.
Main outcome measures: Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography in detecting individuals with advanced neoplasia (ie, advanced adenoma or CRC) 6 mm or larger.
Results: Of 1103 participants, 937 were included in the final analysis: 373 cases in the family-history group, 343 in the group with personal history of adenomas, and 221 in the FOBT-positive group. Overall, CT colonography identified 151 of 177 participants with advanced neoplasia 6 mm or larger (sensitivity, 85.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 79.0%-90.0%) and correctly classified results as negative for 667 of 760 participants without such lesions (specificity, 87.8%; 95% CI, 85.2%-90.0%). The positive and negative predictive values were 61.9% (95% CI, 55.4%-68.0%) and 96.3% (95% CI, 94.6%-97.5%), respectively; after group stratification, a significantly lower negative predictive value was found for the FOBT-positive group (84.9%; 95% CI, 76.2%-91.3%; P < .001).
Conclusions: In a group of persons at increased risk for CRC, CT colonography compared with colonoscopy resulted in a negative predictive value of 96.3% overall. When limited to FOBT-positive persons, the negative predictive value was 84.9%.
Comment in
-
Computed tomographic colonography for patients at high risk of colorectal cancer: trading accuracy for access and compliance.JAMA. 2009 Jun 17;301(23):2498-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.864. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19531793 No abstract available.
-
Computed tomographic colonography for detecting advanced neoplasia.JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1527-8; author reply 1528-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1435. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19826017 No abstract available.
-
Computed tomographic colonography for detecting advanced neoplasia.JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1527; author reply 1528-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1434. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19826018 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Noncathartic CT colonography to screen for colorectal neoplasia in subjects with a family history of colorectal cancer.Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):784-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130373. Epub 2013 Nov 22. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 24475809
-
Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.Gastroenterology. 2013 Apr;144(4):743-750.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.12.041. Epub 2013 Feb 13. Gastroenterology. 2013. PMID: 23415805
-
Effect of faecal occult blood positivity on detection rates and positive predictive value of CT colonography when screening for colorectal neoplasia.Clin Radiol. 2015 Oct;70(10):1104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Clin Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26145187
-
Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2014 May;24(5):1049-58. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3106-0. Epub 2014 Feb 12. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24519111 Review.
-
Comparison of the accuracy of CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;16(3):O82-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12506. Colorectal Dis. 2014. PMID: 24299052 Review.
Cited by
-
[CT colonography : Technique and indications].Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023 Jun;63(6):418-428. doi: 10.1007/s00117-023-01153-4. Epub 2023 May 30. Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 37249607 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
A generative flow-based model for volumetric data augmentation in 3D deep learning for computed tomographic colonography.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Jan;16(1):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02275-z. Epub 2020 Nov 5. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021. PMID: 33150471 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2967-2982. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07413-4. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33104846 Review.
-
Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial-the VICOCA study.BMC Med. 2020 Sep 18;18(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01717-4. BMC Med. 2020. PMID: 32943059 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.Gut. 2020 Feb;69(2):201-223. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858. Epub 2019 Nov 27. Gut. 2020. PMID: 31776230 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical

