Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 6 (5), 1691-705

Cigarettes Butts and the Case for an Environmental Policy on Hazardous Cigarette Waste

Affiliations

Cigarettes Butts and the Case for an Environmental Policy on Hazardous Cigarette Waste

Thomas E Novotny et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health.

Abstract

Discarded cigarette butts are a form of non-biodegradable litter. Carried as runoff from streets to drains, to rivers, and ultimately to the ocean and its beaches, cigarette filters are the single most collected item in international beach cleanups each year. They are an environmental blight on streets, sidewalks, and other open areas. Rather than being a protective health device, cigarette filters are primarily a marketing tool to help sell 'safe' cigarettes. They are perceived by much of the public (especially current smokers) to reduce the health risks of smoking through technology. Filters have reduced the machine-measured yield of tar and nicotine from burning cigarettes, but there is controversy as to whether this has correspondingly reduced the disease burden of smoking to the population. Filters actually may serve to sustain smoking by making it seem less urgent for smokers to quit and easier for children to initiate smoking because of reduced irritation from early experimentation. Several options are available to reduce the environmental impact of cigarette butt waste, including developing biodegradable filters, increasing fines and penalties for littering butts, monetary deposits on filters, increasing availability of butt receptacles, and expanded public education. It may even be possible to ban the sale of filtered cigarettes altogether on the basis of their adverse environmental impact. This option may be attractive in coastal regions where beaches accumulate butt waste and where smoking indoors is increasingly prohibited. Additional research is needed on the various policy options, including behavioral research on the impact of banning the sale of filtered cigarettes altogether.

Keywords: butts; cigarette litter; environment; filters; smoking; waste.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Market share and sales of filtered and non-filtered cigarettes in the United States, 1925–1993.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cigarettes and Cigarette Filters Collected in the United States in the International Coastal Cleanup, 1996–2007. Source: Ocean Conservancy 2007.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 33 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services The Health Consequences of Smoking: the Changing Cigarette—A Report of the Surgeon General, 1981DHHS publication no. (PHS)81-50156. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; Rockville, MA, USA: 1981
    1. Engeland A, Haldorsen T, Andersen A, Tretli S. The impact of smoking habits on lung cancer risk: 28 years’ observation of 26,000 Norwegian men and women. Cancer Cause. Control. 1996;7:366–376. - PubMed
    1. Tang JL, Morris JK, Wald NJ, Hole D, Shipley M, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Mortality in relation to tar yield of cigarettes: a prospective study of four cohorts. BMJ. 1995;311:1530–1533. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute . Risks Associated with Smoking Cigarettes with Low Machine-Measured Yields of Tar and Nicotine. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institutes; Bethesda, MD, USA: Oct, 2001.
    1. Tobacco Free Kids Special Reports: Justice Department Civil Lawsuit (updated 17 November 2006). Available online: http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/reports/doj/ (accessed November 8, 2008).

Publication types

Feedback