Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) and lymphocyte-rich classical Hodgkin lymphoma (LRCHL), although clinically and morphologically similar, differ biologically and in prognosis. Immunolabeling of Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells in LRCHL and lymphocytic and/or histiocytic variants (L&H cells) in NLPHL is often required to help distinguish between the 2 variants. Our aim was to evaluate fascin (a distinct 55-kd actin-bundling protein) and JunB (an activator protein-1 family transcription factor) to differentiate NLPHL from LRCHL. A total of 35 archival cases of NLPHL (n = 24) and LRCHL (n = 11) from adults and children were studied. Slides were reviewed for all cases and clinical, morphologic, and immunohistochemical features were evaluated. Each case was immunostained for fascin and JunB, and immunoreactivity of RS cells, L&H cells, and background lymphocytes were recorded. Whereas occasional L&H cells were weakly positive for fascin in 3 out of 24 (12.5%) cases of NLPHL, RS cells in LRCHL were positive for fascin in 11 out of 11 (100%) cases with a strong cytoplasmic staining pattern. JunB was positive in 10 out of 24 (41.7%) of NLPHL cases, and 11 out of 11 (100%) of LRCHL cases, showing a stippled and/or diffuse nuclear staining pattern. In addition to L & H Cells, JunB also stained small background lymphocytes, particularly in areas of progressively transformed germinal centers of NLPHL. Either stains when tested alone, if negative, or with rare L&H cell weak positivity for fascin, is indicative of NLPHL. The L&H cells of NLPHL cases were negative for concomitant staining in 24 out of 24 (100%) cases. Concomitant positive staining of classic RS cells for fascin and JunB was found in 11 out of 11 (100%) of LRCHL cases. Although fascin positivity alone supports the diagnosis of LRCHL, concomitant positivity offers stronger support and is less likely to lead to a false conclusion if aberrant fascin staining were to be encountered in a case of NLPHL. Staining for fascin and JunB provides a basis for distinguishing NLPHL from LRCHL and offers an alternative to other antibody profiles.