Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 44 (9), 944-51

Use of the lactose-[13C]ureide Breath Test for Diagnosis of Small Bowel Bacterial Overgrowth: Comparison to the Glucose Hydrogen Breath Test

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Use of the lactose-[13C]ureide Breath Test for Diagnosis of Small Bowel Bacterial Overgrowth: Comparison to the Glucose Hydrogen Breath Test

Heiner K Berthold et al. J Gastroenterol.

Abstract

Purpose: The glucose hydrogen breath test (GHBT) is commonly used as a noninvasive test to diagnose small bowel bacterial overgrowth (SBBO) but its validity has been questioned. Our aim was to evaluate the lactose-[(13)C]ureide breath test (LUBT) to diagnose SBBO and to compare it with the GHBT, using cultures of intestinal aspirates as a gold standard.

Methods: In 22 patients with suspected SBBO (14 male, age range 18-73 years) aspirates were taken from the region of the ligament of Treitz under sterile conditions and cultured for bacterial growth. More than 10(6) colony-forming units/mL fluid or the presence of colonic flora was defined as culture positive (c+). After oral intake of 50 g glucose and 2 g of lactose-[(13)C]ureide, end-expiratory breath samples were obtained up to 120 min. The (13)C/(12)C ratio in breath CO(2) was determined by isotope ratio-mass spectrometry and hydrogen concentration in breath was analyzed electrochemically.

Results: After analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves of the LUBT results, total label recovery of >0.88% at 120 min was considered positive. The test had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 100% to predict c+. In the GHBT, an increase of the signal of > or =12 ppm from baseline was considered positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 41.7 and 44.4%, respectively.

Conclusions: The new stable isotope-labeled LUBT has excellent specificity but suboptimal sensitivity. In contrast, the standard GHBT lacks both high sensitivity and specificity. The LUBT is superior to the GHBT for detecting SBBO.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 PubMed Central articles

References

    1. Adv Intern Med. 1993;38:387-407 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1979 May;76(5 Pt 1):1035-55 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997 Jan;51(1):11-9 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 2006 Mar;55(3):297-303 - PubMed
    1. Br J Nutr. 1982 Sep;48(2):305-18 - PubMed
Feedback