Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):637-44.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3111. Epub 2009 Jun 30.

Clinical decision support capabilities of commercially-available clinical information systems

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical decision support capabilities of commercially-available clinical information systems

Adam Wright et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: The most effective decision support systems are integrated with clinical information systems, such as inpatient and outpatient electronic health records (EHRs) and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems. Purpose The goal of this project was to describe and quantify the results of a study of decision support capabilities in Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) certified electronic health record systems.

Methods: The authors conducted a series of interviews with representatives of nine commercially available clinical information systems, evaluating their capabilities against 42 different clinical decision support features.

Results: Six of the nine reviewed systems offered all the applicable event-driven, action-oriented, real-time clinical decision support triggers required for initiating clinical decision support interventions. Five of the nine systems could access all the patient-specific data items identified as necessary. Six of the nine systems supported all the intervention types identified as necessary to allow clinical information systems to tailor their interventions based on the severity of the clinical situation and the user's workflow. Only one system supported all the offered choices identified as key to allowing physicians to take action directly from within the alert. Discussion The principal finding relates to system-by-system variability. The best system in our analysis had only a single missing feature (from 42 total) while the worst had eighteen.This dramatic variability in CDS capability among commercially available systems was unexpected and is a cause for concern.

Conclusions: These findings have implications for four distinct constituencies: purchasers of clinical information systems, developers of clinical decision support, vendors of clinical information systems and certification bodies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paterno MD, Maviglia SM, Gorman PN, et al. Tiering drug-drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance ratesJan–Feb J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16(1):40-46Epub 2008 Oct 24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, et al. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical remindersJul–Aug J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12(4):438-447. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morimoto T, Gandhi TK, Seger AC, Hsieh TC, Bates DW. Adverse drug events and medication errors: Detection and classification methods Qual Saf Health Care August2004;13(4):306-314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, et al. Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample Ann Intern Med 21December2004;141(12):938-945. - PubMed
    1. Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb CT, et al. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians Arch Intern Med 14Febr 2000;160(3):301-308. - PubMed

Publication types