Famotidine for the prevention of peptic ulcers and oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin (FAMOUS): a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- PMID: 19577798
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61246-0
Famotidine for the prevention of peptic ulcers and oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin (FAMOUS): a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Abstract
Background: There are few therapeutic options for the prevention of gastrointestinal mucosal damage caused by low-dose aspirin. We therefore investigated the efficacy of famotidine, a well-tolerated histamine H(2)-receptor antagonist, in the prevention of peptic ulcers and erosive oesophagitis in patients receiving low-dose aspirin for vascular protection.
Methods: Adult patients (aged >/=18 years) from the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and diabetes clinics at Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK, were eligible for enrolment in this phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial if they were taking aspirin 75-325 mg per day with or without other cardioprotective drugs. Patients without ulcers or erosive oesophagitis on endoscopy at baseline were randomly assigned by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive famotidine 20 mg twice daily (n=204) or placebo twice daily (n=200). Patients had a final endoscopic examination at 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the development of new ulcers in the stomach or duodenum or erosive oesophagitis at 12 weeks after randomisation. Analysis was by intention to treat, including all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug (famotidine or placebo). This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Clinical Trial, number ISRCTN96975557.
Findings: All randomised patients received at least one dose and were included in the ITT population. 82 patients (famotidine, n=33; placebo, n=49) did not have the final endoscopic examination and were assumed to have had normal findings; the main reason for participant withdrawal was refusal to continue. At 12 weeks, comparing patients assigned to famotidine with patients assigned to placebo, gastric ulcers had developed in seven (3.4%) of 204 patients compared with 30 (15.0%) of 200 patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.47; p=0.0002); duodenal ulcers had developed in one (0.5%) patient compared with 17 (8.5%; OR 0.05, 0.01-0.40; p=0.0045); and erosive oesophagitis in nine (4.4%) compared with 38 (19.0%; OR 0.20, 0.09-0.42; p<0.0001), respectively. There were fewer adverse events in the famotidine group than in the placebo group (nine vs 15); four patients in the placebo group were admitted to hospital with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The other most common adverse event was angina (famotidine, n=2; placebo, n=4).
Interpretation: Famotidine is effective in the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcers, and erosive oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin. These findings widen the therapeutic options for the prevention of gastrointestinal damage in patients needing vascular protection.
Funding: Merck Laboratories and Astellas Pharma.
Comment in
-
NSAIDs and aspirin: notorious or FAMOUS?Lancet. 2009 Jul 11;374(9684):93-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61245-9. Epub 2009 Jul 3. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19577799 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Famotidine for the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcers caused by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.N Engl J Med. 1996 May 30;334(22):1435-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605303342204. N Engl J Med. 1996. PMID: 8618582 Clinical Trial.
-
Misoprostol for small bowel ulcers in patients with obscure bleeding taking aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (MASTERS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;3(7):469-476. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30119-5. Epub 2018 May 10. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29754836 Clinical Trial.
-
Famotidine is inferior to pantoprazole in preventing recurrence of aspirin-related peptic ulcers or erosions.Gastroenterology. 2010 Jan;138(1):82-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.063. Epub 2009 Nov 11. Gastroenterology. 2010. PMID: 19837071 Clinical Trial.
-
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: add an anti-ulcer drug for patients at high risk only. Always limit the dose and duration of treatment with NSAIDs.Prescrire Int. 2011 Sep;20(119):216-9. Prescrire Int. 2011. PMID: 21954519 Review.
-
The therapeutic efficacy of misoprostol in peptic ulcer disease.Postgrad Med J. 1988;64 Suppl 1:60-77. Postgrad Med J. 1988. PMID: 3138682 Review.
Cited by
-
Acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding management in older people taking or not taking anticoagulants: a literature review.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 3;11:1399429. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1399429. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38765253 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with eupatilin in aspirin plus acid suppressant users: nationwide population-based study.Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(2):261-271. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.324. Epub 2023 Dec 14. Korean J Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38092556 Free PMC article.
-
Aspirin vs Clopidogrel: Antiplatelet Agent of Choice for Those With Recent Bleeding or at Risk for Gastrointestinal Bleed.Cureus. 2023 Apr 20;15(4):e37890. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37890. eCollection 2023 Apr. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37213942 Free PMC article. Review.
-
JCS/JHRS 2020 Guideline on Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.J Arrhythm. 2022 Oct 25;38(6):833-973. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12714. eCollection 2022 Dec. J Arrhythm. 2022. PMID: 36524037 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
In Vitro and In Vivo Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Aspirin on Rabbit Esophageal Epithelium.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;33(3):257-270. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.201168. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35410859 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
